ArticleStudies in health technology and informatics2011
SNOMED CT's RF2: Is the future bright?
Article in Studies in health technology and informatics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- SNOMED CT standard ontology based on the ontology for general medical science.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018Article
- Analyzing structural changes in SNOMED CT's Bacterial infectious diseases using a visual semantic delta.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2017Article
- Can SNOMED CT Changes Be Used as a Surrogate Standard for Evaluating the Performance of Its Auditing Methods?AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2017Article
- Taxonomy-Based Approaches to Quality Assurance of Ontologies.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2017Article
- A unified software framework for deriving, visualizing, and exploring abstraction networks for ontologies.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2016Article
- Tracking the Remodeling of SNOMED CT's Bacterial Infectious Diseases.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2016Article
- Analyzing SNOMED CT's Historical Data: Pitfalls and Possibilities.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
SNOMED CT's new RF2 format is said to come with features for better configuration management of the SNOMED vocabulary, thereby accommodating evolving requirements without the need for further fundamental change in the foreseeable future. Although the available documentation is not yet convincing enough to support this claim, the newly introduced Model Component hierarchy and associated reference set mechanism seem to hold real promise of being able to deal successfully with a number of ontological issues that have been discussed in the recent literature. Backed up by a study of the old and new format and of the relevant literature and documentation, three recommendations are presented that would free SNOMED CT from use-mention confusions, unclear referencing of real-world entities and uninformative reasons for change in a way that does not force SNOMED CT to take a specific philosophical or ontological position.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21893863PMC3379709What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.