Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21893421›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular graphics & modelling2011

Characterizing protein motions from structure.

Charles C David, Donald J Jacobs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular graphics & modelling, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Charles C DavidDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genomics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.
Donald J Jacobs

Funding

Predicting protein flexibility and stabilityR01GM073082 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE · PI JACOBS, DONALD · 2006 to 2010
$1.6M
Energy Transduction in MyosinR21HL093531 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE · PI YENGO, CHRISTOPHER M · 2009 to 2010
$390k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL093531NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL093531NIGMS NIH HHS GM073082NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM073082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To clarify the extent structure plays in determining protein dynamics, a comparative study is made using three models that characterize native state dynamics of single domain proteins starting from known structures taken from four distinct SCOP classifications. A geometrical simulation using the framework rigidity optimized dynamics algorithm (FRODA) based on rigid cluster decomposition is compared to the commonly employed elastic network model (specifically the Anisotropic Network Model ANM) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. The essential dynamics are quantified by a mode subspace constructed from ANM and a principal component analysis (PCA) on FRODA and MD trajectories. Aggregate conformational ensembles are constructed to provide a basis for quantitative comparisons between FRODA runs using different parameter settings to critically assess how the predictions of essential dynamics depend on a priori arbitrary user-defined distance constraint rules. We established a range of physicality for these parameters. Surprisingly, FRODA maintains greater intra-consistent results than obtained from MD trajectories, comparable to ANM. Additionally, a mode subspace is constructed from PCA on an exemplar set of myoglobin structures from the Protein Data Bank. Significant overlap across the three model subspaces and the experimentally derived subspace is found. While FRODA provides the most robust sampling and characterization of the native basin, all three models give similar dynamical information of a native state, further demonstrating that structure is the key determinant of dynamics.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationAlgorithmsAnisotropyDatabases, ProteinModels, MolecularMyoglobinPrincipal Component AnalysisProteinsProtein Structure, TertiaryStructure-Activity RelationshipMyoglobinProteins

Identifiers

PMID21893421
PMCPMC4667955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.