Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21892879›Full record

ArticleXenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems2011

Interspecies scaling and prediction of human clearance: comparison of small- and macro-molecule drugs.

Yeamin Huh, David E Smith, Meihau Rose Feng

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yeamin HuhDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
David E Smith
Meihau Rose Feng
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Role of PEPT2 in Peptide/Mimetic Disposition-DynamicsR01GM035498 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SMITH, DAVID E · 1988 to 2013
$3.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM035498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human clearance prediction for small- and macro-molecule drugs was evaluated and compared using various scaling methods and statistical analysis. Human clearance is generally well predicted using single or multiple species simple allometry for macro- and small-molecule drugs excreted renally. The prediction error is higher for hepatically eliminated small-molecules using single or multiple species simple allometry scaling, and it appears that the prediction error is mainly associated with drugs with low hepatic extraction ratio (Eh). The error in human clearance prediction for hepatically eliminated small-molecules was reduced using scaling methods with a correction of maximum life span (MLP) or brain weight (BRW). Human clearance of both small- and macro-molecule drugs is well predicted using the monkey liver blood flow method. Predictions using liver blood flow from other species did not work as well, especially for the small-molecule drugs.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansLiverMacromolecular SubstancesMolecular WeightPharmaceutical PreparationsRegional Blood FlowSmall Molecule LibrariesSpecies SpecificityMacromolecular SubstancesPharmaceutical PreparationsSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID21892879
PMCPMC4181675
OpenAlexW2055353351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.