ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2011
1H-MRS of hepatic fat using short TR at 3T: SNR optimization and fast T2 relaxometry.
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proton MR Spectroscopy Measurements of White and Brown Adipose Tissue in Healthy Humans: Relaxation Parameters and Unsaturated Fatty Acids.Radiology · 2021Article
- The effect of water suppression on the hepatic lipid quantification, as assessed by the LCModel, in a preclinical and clinical scenario.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2016Article
- In vivo breath-hold (1) H MRS simultaneous estimation of liver proton density fat fraction, and T1 and T2 of water and fat, with a multi-TR, multi-TE sequence.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2015Article
- 3.0T ¹H magnetic resonance spectroscopy for assessment of steatosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Article
- Article
- Feasibility and reproducibility of echo planar spectroscopic imaging on the quantification of hepatic fat.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectTo increase the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) efficiency of hepatic fat signals in proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS) at 3 T, in order to improve the quantitation of hepatic fat and allow fast, single breath-hold T2 relaxometry of hepatic water and fat. MATERIALS AND
methodsSince the T1 of lipid protons is relatively short, we hypothesized that it could be possible to increase the lipid SNR efficiency by choosing a TR shorter than that typically employed (≥1.5 s). The lipid SNR per unit-time was calculated using published values of lipid (CH2)n protons' T1 at 3 T. 1H MRS PRESS spectra were acquired from VOIs located in the right lobe of the liver in 28 healthy volunteers. At the short TR of 0.6 s, fast T2 relaxometry with the acquisition of 16 echo times (30, 40, ..., 180 ms), was performed in a single breath-hold measurement using a modified PRESS sequence.
resultsGood agreement was observed between simulated and experimental data, with the shortening of TR to 0.6 s yielding an ~50% SNR improvement of hepatic lipid (CH2)n resonances, compared to the SNR at TR=2 s. The T2 relaxation time of water and lipid (CH2)n protons at 3 T was 25.8±1.1 ms and 55.4±3.9 ms, respectively, across five healthy volunteers.
conclusionThe short-TR approach allows for an improved SNR efficiency of lipids and for fast T2 relaxometry of hepatic water and fat, with a detailed coverage of the T2 relaxation decay curve, within a single breath-hold experiment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.