Trial reportOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2012
Infections in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with denosumab or placebo: coincidence or causal association?
Trial report in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00089791 (A Study to Evaluate Denosumab in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis FREEDOM), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Study to Evaluate Denosumab in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis FREEDOM (Fracture REduction Evaluation of Denosumab in Osteoporosis Every 6 Months)
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Superiority of denosumab over bisphosphonates in preventing and treating glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis with GRADE quality assessment.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Pooled it
- Vertebral remodeling with denosumab after infection control inJBMR plus · 2026Article
- Comparative safety of denosumab and romosozumab in osteoporosis: an analysis based on the FDA adverse event reporting system database.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Rheumatoid Arthritis and Osteoporosis as Prototypes of Immunosenescence in Osteoimmunology: Molecular Pathways of Inflammaging and Targeted Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Does the Use of Denosumab in Combination with bDMARDs or tsDMARDs Increase the Risk of Infection in Patients with Osteoporosis and Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Treatment Considerations for Severe Osteoporosis in Older Adults.Drugs & aging · 2025Review
- Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab: Insights beyond 10 Years of Use.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Review
- The Pathophysiology, Identification and Management of Fracture Risk, Sublesional Osteoporosis and Fracture among Adults with Spinal Cord Injury.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Medical optimization of osteoporosis for adult spinal deformity surgery: a state-of-the-art evidence-based review of current pharmacotherapy.Spine deformity · 2023Review
- The clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022Article
- Fracture Risk of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Chronic Kidney Disease.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2022Article
- Personalized Therapeutic Strategies in the Management of Osteoporosis in Patients with Autoantibody-Positive Rheumatoid Arthritis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Trends in utilisation of plain X-rays by older Australians (2010-2019).BMC geriatrics · 2022Article
- Molecular Targeted Therapy for the Bone Loss Secondary to Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis Using Medications for Osteoporosis: A Literature Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Should denosumab treatment for osteoporosis be continued indefinitely?Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2021Review
- DRESS syndrome in response to Denosumab: First documented case report.Bone reports · 2020Article
- Pros and Cons of Denosumab Treatment for Osteoporosis and Implication for RANKL Aptamer Therapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Review
- Effect of Denosumab on Bone Mineral Density of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients.International journal of endocrinology · 2020Article
- Small molecule nAS-E targeting cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) and CREB-binding protein interaction inhibits breast cancer bone metastasis.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledSerious adverse events of infections that occurred in subjects receiving denosumab or placebo in the Fracture Reduction Evaluation of Denosumab in Osteoporosis every 6 Months (FREEDOM) study were examined in detail. Serious adverse events of infections in denosumab subjects had heterogeneous etiology, with no clear clinical pattern to suggest a relationship to time or duration of exposure to denosumab.
introductionDenosumab reduces the risk for new vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral fractures compared with placebo. In the pivotal phase 3 fracture trial (FREEDOM), the overall safety profile and incidence of adverse events including adverse events of infections were similar between groups. Serious adverse events of erysipelas and cellulitis were more frequent in denosumab-treated subjects. In this report, we further evaluate the details of infectious events in FREEDOM to better understand if RANKL inhibition with denosumab influences infection risk.
methodsFREEDOM was an international multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 3,906) or denosumab 60 mg every 6 months (n = 3,902). The incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events categorized within the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities system organ class, "Infections and Infestations," was compared between the placebo and denosumab groups by body systems and preferred terms. The temporal relationship between occurrence of serious adverse events of infections of interest and administration of denosumab was explored.
resultsSerious adverse events of infections involving the gastrointestinal system, renal and urinary system, ear, and endocarditis were numerically higher in the denosumab group compared with placebo, but the number of events was small. No relationship was observed between serious adverse events of infections and timing of administration or duration of exposure to denosumab.
conclusionsSerious adverse events of infections that occurred with denosumab treatment had heterogeneous etiology, with no clear clinical pattern to suggest a relationship to time or duration of exposure to denosumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.