Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21892677›Full record

Trial reportOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2012

Infections in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with denosumab or placebo: coincidence or causal association?

N B Watts, C Roux, J F Modlin, J P Brown, A Daniels, S Jackson, S Smith, D J Zack, L Zhou, A Grauer and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00089791 (A Study to Evaluate Denosumab in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis FREEDOM), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00089791 phase3completednot on this map

A Study to Evaluate Denosumab in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis FREEDOM (Fracture REduction Evaluation of Denosumab in Osteoporosis Every 6 Months)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2004 to 2008Enrolled7,808ConditionsOsteoporosisArmsplacebo, Denosumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab: Insights beyond 10 Years of Use.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. The clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Article
  12. Fracture Risk of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Chronic Kidney Disease.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Should denosumab treatment for osteoporosis be continued indefinitely?Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

N B WattsBone Health and Osteoporosis Center, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, 222 Piedmont Avenue, Suite 6300, Cincinnati, OH 45219, USA. nelson.watts@uc.edu
C Roux
J F Modlin
J P Brown
A Daniels
S Jackson
S Smith
D J Zack
L Zhou
A Grauer
S Ferrari

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledSerious adverse events of infections that occurred in subjects receiving denosumab or placebo in the Fracture Reduction Evaluation of Denosumab in Osteoporosis every 6 Months (FREEDOM) study were examined in detail. Serious adverse events of infections in denosumab subjects had heterogeneous etiology, with no clear clinical pattern to suggest a relationship to time or duration of exposure to denosumab.

introductionDenosumab reduces the risk for new vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral fractures compared with placebo. In the pivotal phase 3 fracture trial (FREEDOM), the overall safety profile and incidence of adverse events including adverse events of infections were similar between groups. Serious adverse events of erysipelas and cellulitis were more frequent in denosumab-treated subjects. In this report, we further evaluate the details of infectious events in FREEDOM to better understand if RANKL inhibition with denosumab influences infection risk.

methodsFREEDOM was an international multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 3,906) or denosumab 60 mg every 6 months (n = 3,902). The incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events categorized within the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities system organ class, "Infections and Infestations," was compared between the placebo and denosumab groups by body systems and preferred terms. The temporal relationship between occurrence of serious adverse events of infections of interest and administration of denosumab was explored.

resultsSerious adverse events of infections involving the gastrointestinal system, renal and urinary system, ear, and endocarditis were numerically higher in the denosumab group compared with placebo, but the number of events was small. No relationship was observed between serious adverse events of infections and timing of administration or duration of exposure to denosumab.

conclusionsSerious adverse events of infections that occurred with denosumab treatment had heterogeneous etiology, with no clear clinical pattern to suggest a relationship to time or duration of exposure to denosumab.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleEndocarditisFemaleGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansMiddle AgedOpportunistic InfectionsOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalOsteoporotic FracturesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabPlacebosRANK Ligand

Identifiers

PMID21892677
PMCPMC3249159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.