Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21892661›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2012

Changes in disparities following the implementation of a health information technology-supported quality improvement initiative.

Muriel Jean-Jacques, Stephen D Persell, Jason A Thompson, Romana Hasnain-Wynia, David W Baker

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Health informatics and health equity: improving our reach and impact.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Understanding Black Patients' Refusal of Pneumococcal Vaccination.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Muriel Jean-JacquesDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. mjeanjacques@northwestern.edu
Stephen D Persell
Jason A Thompson
Romana Hasnain-Wynia
David W Baker

Funding

MULTIDISCIPLINARY CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE (MCTS) PROGRAM (UL1)UL1RR025741 · NCRR · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GREENLAND, PHILIP · 2008 to 2011
$24.7M
Using Precision Performance Measurement to Conduct Focused Quality ImprovementR18HS017163 · AHRQ · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BAKER, DAVID W. · 2007 to 2009
$1.2M
Tailored Communication to Reduce Cardiovascular RiskK08HS015647 · AHRQ · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI PERSELL, STEPHEN · 2006 to 2010
$628k
AHRQ HHS 5R18HS017163AHRQ HHS K08 HS015647AHRQ HHS K08HS015647AHRQ HHS R18 HS017163NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR0254741NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth information technology (HIT)-supported quality improvement initiatives have been shown to increase ambulatory care quality for several chronic conditions and preventive services, but it is not known whether these types of initiatives reduce disparities.

objectivesTo examine the effects of a multifaceted, HIT-supported quality improvement initiative on disparities in ambulatory care.

designTime series models were used to assess changes in racial disparities in performance between white and black patients for 17 measures of chronic disease and preventive care from February 2008 through February 2010, the first 2 years after implementation of a HIT-supported, provider-directed quality improvement initiative. PATIENTS: Black and white adults receiving care in an academic general internal medicine practice in Chicago.

interventionsThe quality improvement initiative used provider-directed point-of-care clinical decision support tools and quality feedback to target improvement in process of care and intermediate outcome measures for coronary heart disease, heart failure, hypertension, and diabetes as well as receipt of several preventive services. MAIN MEASURES: Modeled rate of change in performance, stratified by race and modeled rate of change in disparities for 17 ambulatory care quality measures KEY

resultsQuality of care improved for 14 of 17 measures among white patients and 10 of 17 measures among black patients. Quality improved for both white and black patients for five of eight process of care measures, four of five preventive services, but none of the four intermediate outcome measures. Of the seven measures with racial disparities at baseline, disparities declined for two, remained stable for four, and increased for one measure after implementation of the quality improvement initiative.

conclusionsGeneralized and provider-directed quality improvement initiatives can decrease racial disparities for some chronic disease and preventive care measures, but achieving equity in areas with persistent disparities will require more targeted, patient-directed, and systems-oriented strategies.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory CareAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment ActBlack or African AmericanFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of Health CareUnited StatesWhite People

Identifiers

PMID21892661
PMCPMC3250541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.