Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21891847›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2011

Predictive models for pressure-driven fluid infusions into brain parenchyma.

Raghu Raghavan, Martin Brady

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Convection-Enhanced DeliveryFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. On the microstructural origin of brain white matter hydraulic permeability.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. FCNN-based axon segmentation for convection-enhanced delivery optimization.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Raghu RaghavanTherataxis, LLC, JHU Eastern Complex, Suite B305, 1101 E 33rd St, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA. raghu@therataxis.com
Martin Brady

Funding

Systems for intra-parenchymal therapy deliveryR44NS043105 · NINDS · THERATAXIS, LLC · PI RAGHAVAN, RAGHU · 2002 to 2004
$730k
NINDS NIH HHS R44 NS043105NINDS NIH HHS R44-NS043105-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct infusions into brain parenchyma of biological therapeutics for serious brain diseases have been, and are being, considered. However, individual brains, as well as distinct cytoarchitectural regions within brains, vary in their response to fluid flow and pressure. Further, the tissue responds dynamically to these stimuli, requiring a nonlinear treatment of equations that would describe fluid flow and drug transport in brain. We here report in detail on an individual-specific model and a comparison of its prediction with simulations for living porcine brains. Two critical features we introduced into our model-absent from previous ones, but requirements for any useful simulation-are the infusion-induced interstitial expansion and the backflow. These are significant determinants of the flow. Another feature of our treatment is the use of cross-property relations to obtain individual-specific parameters that are coefficients in the equations. The quantitative results are at least encouraging, showing a high fraction of overlap between the computed and measured volumes of distribution of a tracer molecule and are potentially clinically useful. Several improvements are called for; principally a treatment of the interstitial expansion more fundamentally based on poroelasticity and a better delineation of the diffusion tensor of a particle confined to the interstitial spaces.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsBiological TransportBrainBrain DiseasesBrain MappingComputer SimulationDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingInfusion PumpsPressureRadiographySwine

Identifiers

PMID21891847
PMCPMC3249646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.