Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21890899›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2011

Identification and remediation of biases in the activity of RNA ligases in small-RNA deep sequencing.

Anitha D Jayaprakash, Omar Jabado, Brian D Brown, Ravi Sachidanandam

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 157 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
157citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

157 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Small RNA Analysis in Cancer Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Guidelines for mitochondrial RNA analysis.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

97 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anitha D JayaprakashDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1425 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Omar Jabado
Brian D Brown
Ravi Sachidanandam

Funding

Novel Strategy to Induce Islet Protective Regulatory T Cells and Prevent DiabetesDP2DK083052 · NIDDK · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI BROWN, BRIAN D · 2008 to 2013
$2.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS DP2DK083052-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep sequencing of small RNAs (sRNA-seq) is now the gold standard for small RNA profiling and discovery. Biases in sRNA-seq have been reported, but their etiology remains unidentified. Through a comprehensive series of sRNA-seq experiments, we establish that the predominant cause of the bias is the RNA ligases. We further demonstrate that RNA ligases have strong sequence-specific biases which distort the small RNA profiles considerably. We have devised a pooled adapter strategy to overcome this bias, and validated the method through data derived from microarray and qPCR. In light of our findings, published small RNA profiles, as well as barcoding strategies using adapter-end modifications, may need to be revisited. Importantly, by providing a wide spectrum of substrate for the ligase, the pooled-adapter strategy developed here provides a means to overcome issues of bias, and generate more accurate small RNA profiles.

Indexed as

RNA Ligase (ATP)AnimalsBiasGene Expression ProfilingHEK293 CellsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMiceRNA, Small UntranslatedSequence Analysis, RNARNA Ligase (ATP)RNA, Small Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID21890899
PMCPMC3241666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.