Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21890792›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of psychiatry2012

Behavioral health insurance parity: does Oregon's experience presage the national experience with the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act?

K John McConnell, Samuel H N Gast, M Susan Ridgely, Neal Wallace, Natalie Jacuzzi, Traci Rieckmann, Bentson H McFarland, Dennis McCarty

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of psychiatry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Schizophrenia in a Primary Care Setting.Current psychiatry reports · 2015
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The effects of federal parity on substance use disorder treatment.The American journal of managed care · 2014
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

K John McConnellOregon Health and Science University, USA. mcconnjo@ohsu.edu
Samuel H N Gast
M Susan Ridgely
Neal Wallace
Natalie Jacuzzi
Traci Rieckmann
Bentson H McFarland
Dennis McCarty

Funding

Oregon's Parity Law: Comprehensive Parity in Today's Healthcare EnvironmentR01DA024024 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI MCCONNELL, KENNETH JOHN · 2007 to 2009
$966k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA024024NIDA NIH HHS R01DA024024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 prohibits commercial group health plans from imposing spending and visit limitations for mental health and substance abuse services that are not imposed on medical-surgical services. The act also restricts the use of managed care tools that apply to behavioral health benefits in ways that differ from how they apply to medical-surgical benefits. The only precedent for this approach is Oregon's state parity law, which was implemented in 2007. The goal of this study was to estimate the effect of Oregon's parity law on expenditures for mental health and substance abuse treatment services.

methodThe authors compared expenditures for commercially insured individuals in four Oregon health plans from 2005 through 2008 and a matched group of commercially insured individuals in Oregon who were exempt from parity. Using a difference-in-differences analysis, the authors analyzed the effect of comprehensive parity on spending for mental health and substance abuse services.

resultsIncreases in spending on mental health and substance abuse services after implementation of Oregon's parity law were almost entirely the result of a general trend observed among individuals with and without parity. Expenditures per enrollee for mental health and substance abuse services attributable to parity were positive, but they did not differ significantly from zero in any of the four plans.

conclusionsBehavioral health insurance parity rules that place restrictions on how plans manage mental health and substance abuse services can improve insurance protections without substantial increases in total costs.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsHumansInsurance CoverageInsurance, HealthMental DisordersMental HealthMental Health ServicesOregonSubstance-Related DisordersUnited States

Identifiers

PMID21890792
PMCPMC3263406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.