Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21890753›Full record

Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2011

Lack of sustained improvement in adherence or viral load following a directly observed antiretroviral therapy intervention.

Karina M Berg, Alain H Litwin, Xuan Li, Moonseong Heo, Julia H Arnsten

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions for enhancing medication adherence.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The clinical role and cost-effectiveness of long-acting antiretroviral therapy.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karina M BergDepartment of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA.
Alain H Litwin
Xuan Li
Moonseong Heo
Julia H Arnsten

Funding

Immunology/Pathology CoreP30AI051519 · NIAID · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI KLEIN, ROBERT STEPHEN · 2003 to 2013
$18.6M
Efficacy and cost of HAART DOT in methadone clinicsR01DA015302 · NIDA · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI ARNSTEN, JULIA H · 2003 to 2007
$4.8M
CLINICAL ADDICTION RESEARCH AND EDUCATION (CARE) PROGRAMR25DA014551 · NIDA · MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER (BRONX, NY) · PI ARNSTEN, JULIA H. · 2002 to 2005
$1.3M
Improving Measurement of Antiretroviral Adherence in Current and Former Drug UserK23DA021087 · NIDA · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI BERG, KARINA M · 2006 to 2009
$647k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI051519NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA021087NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015302NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA014551NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA14551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMethadone clinic-based directly observed antiretroviral therapy (DOT) has been shown to be more efficacious for improving adherence and suppressing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) load than antiretroviral self-administration. We sought to determine whether the beneficial effects of DOT remain after DOT is discontinued.

methodsWe conducted a post-trial cohort study of 65 HIV-infected opioid-dependent adults who had completed a 24-week randomized controlled trial of methadone clinic-based DOT versus treatment as usual (TAU). For 12 months after DOT discontinuation, we assessed antiretroviral adherence using monthly pill counts and electronic monitors. We also assessed viral load at 3, 6, and 12 months after DOT ended. We examined differences between DOT and TAU in (1) adherence, (2) viral load, and (3) proportion of participants with viral load of <75 copies/mL.

resultsAt trial end, adherence was higher among DOT participants than among TAU participants (86% and 54%, respectively; P < .001), and more DOT participants than TAU participants had viral loads of <75 copies/mL (71% and 44%, respectively; P = .03). However, after DOT ended, differences in adherence diminished by 1 month (55% for DOT vs 48% for TAU; P = .33) and extinguished completely by 3 months (49% for DOT vs 50% for TAU; P = .94). Differences in viral load between DOT and TAU disappeared by 3 months after the intervention, and the proportion of DOT participants with undetectable viral load decreased steadily after DOT was stopped until there was no difference (36% for DOT and 34% for TAU; P = .92).

conclusionsBecause the benefits of DOT for adherence and viral load among HIV-infected methadone patients cease after DOT is stopped, methadone-based DOT should be considered a long-term intervention.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringViral LoadAdultAnti-HIV AgentsAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveCohort StudiesDirectly Observed TherapyFemaleHIVHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMethadoneMiddle AgedOpiate Substitution TreatmentSubstance-Related DisordersAnti-HIV AgentsMethadone

Identifiers

PMID21890753
PMCPMC3189166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.