Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21889610›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2011

Diagnostic testing for IDH1 and IDH2 variants in acute myeloid leukemia an algorithmic approach using high-resolution melting curve analysis.

Keyur P Patel, Bedia A Barkoh, Zhao Chen, Deqin Ma, Neelima Reddy, L Jeffrey Medeiros, Rajyalakshmi Luthra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Feasible and Rapid Screening ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Diagnostics ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Germline mutations among Polish patients with acute myeloid leukemia.Hereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2021
    Article
  7. Myelodysplastic syndrome with t(6;9)(p22;q34.1)/DEK-NUP214 better classified as acute myeloid leukemia? A multicenter study of 107 cases.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ivosidenib: IDH1 Inhibitor for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2019
    Article
  12. Blood and lymphatic cancer : targets and therapy · 2019
    Review
  13. Secondary Philadelphia chromosome acquired during therapy of acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2018
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A novel truncated form ofOncology letters · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Keyur P PatelDepartment of Hematopathology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77054, USA.
Bedia A Barkoh
Zhao Chen
Deqin Ma
Neelima Reddy
L Jeffrey Medeiros
Rajyalakshmi Luthra

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and IDH2 mutations and polymorphism are reported in 5% to 15% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases, with G105 and R132 of IDH1 and R140 and R172 of IDH2 known to be clinically significant. Current Sanger sequencing assays to detect IDH mutations are labor intensive and not cost effective for clinical testing of low-frequency mutations. Therefore, we developed clinical assays using high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis to screen for all four variants listed above, followed by Sanger sequencing confirmation. The sensitivities of the assays were 7.3% and 7.9% for the detection of IDH2 and IDH1 variants, respectively, against the background of wild-type transcripts. Comparison of HRM to Sanger sequencing on 146 AML bone marrow samples for validation showed near-perfect concordance for all positive and negative results for IDH1 (98%) and IDH2 (94%). Postvalidation clinical implementation of upfront HRM screening (N = 106), using a more conservative algorithm to avoid false-negative results, reduced the number of Sanger sequencing tests by 73% (IDH1) and 78% (IDH2). Of the variant calls made by HRM in postvalidation clinical samples, Sanger confirmed the presence of a variant in 62% (IDH1) and 44% (IDH2) of the samples. In conclusion, our HRM assays are rapid, convenient, and versatile assays for screening and confirmation of alterations in IDH1 and IDH2.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMutationBase SequenceDNA Mutational AnalysisGenotypeHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteNucleic Acid DenaturationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNAIDH1 protein, humanIDH2 protein, humanIsocitrate Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID21889610
PMCPMC3194054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.