Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21888451›Full record

ReviewClinical drug investigation2011

Amphotericin B lipid complex in the management of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients.

Matteo Bassetti, Franco Aversa, Filippo Ballerini, Fabio Benedetti, Alessandro Busca, Nicola Cascavilla, Ercole Concia, Andrea Tendas, Francesco Di Raimondo, Patrizio Mazza and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical drug investigation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mucormycosis (zygomycosis) of renal allograft.Clinical kidney journal · 2012
    Article
  6. Mucormycosis and acute kidney injury.Journal of nephropathology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Matteo BassettiInfectious Diseases Division, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Udine, Italy. mattba@tin.it
Franco Aversa
Filippo Ballerini
Fabio Benedetti
Alessandro Busca
Nicola Cascavilla
Ercole Concia
Andrea Tendas
Francesco Di Raimondo
Patrizio Mazza
Anna Maria Nosari
Giuseppe Rossi
Azienda Ospedaliera S.Giuseppe Moscati · ITAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Giovanni Battista · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITCasa Sollievo della Sofferenza · ITOspedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine · ITSt. Eugenio Hospital · ITUniversity of Catania · ITUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversity of Perugia · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive fungal infections are associated with a poor outcome and their incidence is rising. Amphotericin B has for a long time been the gold standard for treatment of these infections, but the conventional formulation is associated with a high incidence of adverse events. Lipid formulations of amphotericin, developed to overcome these drawbacks, are now routinely used in clinical practice for the treatment of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients. Amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) is prepared from amphotericin complexed to two phospholipids, a process that confers a number of important pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties compared with conventional amphotericin B. The results of retrospective observational studies and the analysis of databases, including the large Collaborative Exchange of Antifungal Research (CLEAR) database, have shown ABLC to be associated with response rates of up to about 80% in patients with confirmed fungal infections and around 60% in those treated empirically. Intranasal administration of ABLC for prophylaxis of invasive fungal infection in immunocompromised patients is safe and appears to be a promising treatment strategy for the future. ABLC is associated with a substantially lower incidence of nephrotoxicity than conventional amphotericin. Infusion-related reactions also occur less frequently than with conventional amphotericin and can be managed using premedication protocols. When direct and indirect costs are measured, ABLC appears to be less expensive than conventional amphotericin. The number of approved antifungal agents that are effective treatments for invasive fungal infections is increasing. However, lipid formulations of amphotericin, such as ABLC, are effective and well tolerated and remain the standard of care in the treatment of invasive fungal infections. Treatment strategies such as intranasal administration for prophylaxis and combination therapy with newer agents are future directions for these agents.

Indexed as

Immunocompromised HostAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsHumansMycosesAmphotericin BAntifungal Agentsliposomal amphotericin B

Identifiers

PMID21888451
OpenAlexW1965056712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.