ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2012
A model for complex sequence learning and reproduction in neural populations.
Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Multiple-Timescale Neural Networks: Generation of History-Dependent Sequences and Inference Through Autonomous Bifurcations.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2021Article
- Temporal-Sequential Learning With a Brain-Inspired Spiking Neural Network and Its Application to Musical Memory.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2020Article
- Probabilistic associative learning suffices for learning the temporal structure of multiple sequences.PloS one · 2019Article
- Model of the songbird nucleus HVC as a network of central pattern generators.Journal of neurophysiology · 2016Article
- Spike-Based Bayesian-Hebbian Learning of Temporal Sequences.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- A Unified Dynamic Model for Learning, Replay, and Sharp-Wave/Ripples.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015Article
- Packet-based communication in the cortex.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2015Review
- Learning of Chunking Sequences in Cognition and Behavior.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- Neural Sequence Generation Using Spatiotemporal Patterns of Inhibition.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- Neural Network Model of Memory Retrieval.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2015Article
- Thinking in circuits: toward neurobiological explanation in cognitive neuroscience.Biological cybernetics · 2014Review
- Associative memory of phase-coded spatiotemporal patterns in leaky Integrate and Fire networks.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2013Article
- Article
- Temporal sequence learning in winner-take-all networks of spiking neurons demonstrated in a brain-based device.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Temporal patterns of activity which repeat above chance level in the brains of vertebrates and in the mammalian neocortex have been reported experimentally. This temporal structure is thought to subserve functions such as movement, speech, and generation of rhythms. Several studies aim to explain how particular sequences of activity are learned, stored, and reproduced. The learning of sequences is usually conceived as the creation of an excitation pathway within a homogeneous neuronal population, but models embodying the autonomous function of such a learning mechanism are fraught with concerns about stability, robustness, and biological plausibility. We present two related computational models capable of learning and reproducing sequences which come from external stimuli. Both models assume that there exist populations of densely interconnected excitatory neurons, and that plasticity can occur at the population level. The first model uses temporally asymmetric Hebbian plasticity to create excitation pathways between populations in response to activation from an external source. The transition of the activity from one population to the next is permitted by the interplay of excitatory and inhibitory populations, which results in oscillatory behavior that seems to agree with experimental findings in the mammalian neocortex. The second model contains two layers, each one like the network used in the first model, with unidirectional excitatory connections from the first to the second layer experiencing Hebbian plasticity. Input sequences presented in the second layer become associated with the ongoing first layer activity, so that this activity can later elicit the the presented sequence in the absence of input. We explore the dynamics of these models, and discuss their potential implications, particularly to working memory, oscillations, and rhythm generation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21887499What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.