Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21887241›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Generalized fragment picking in Rosetta: design, protocols and applications.

Dominik Gront, Daniel W Kulp, Robert M Vernon, Charlie E M Strauss, David Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Deep learning-guided design of dynamic proteins.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Construction of Histone-Protein Complex Structures by Peptide Growing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. PROFASA-a web-based protein fragment and structure analysis workstation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Targeted Mutagenesis of the MulticopyPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dominik GrontFaculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. dgront@chem.uw.edu.pl
Daniel W Kulp
Robert M Vernon
Charlie E M Strauss
David Baker

Funding

High resolution structure modeling with RosettaR01GM092802 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BAKER, DAVID · 2010 to 2017
$2.3M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM092802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Rosetta de novo structure prediction and loop modeling protocols begin with coarse grained Monte Carlo searches in which the moves are based on short fragments extracted from a database of known structures. Here we describe a new object oriented program for picking fragments that greatly extends the functionality of the previous program (nnmake) and opens the door for new approaches to structure modeling. We provide a detailed description of the code design and architecture, highlighting its modularity, and new features such as extensibility, total control over the fragment picking workflow and scoring system customization. We demonstrate that the program provides at least as good building blocks for ab-initio structure prediction as the previous program, and provide examples of the wide range of applications that are now accessible.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularSoftwareComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinUbiquitinUbiquitin

Identifiers

PMID21887241
PMCPMC3160850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.