Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21887227›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Photosynthetic responses to heat treatments at different temperatures and following recovery in grapevine (Vitis amurensis L.) leaves.

Hai-Bo Luo, Ling Ma, Hui-Feng Xi, Wei Duan, Shao-Hua Li, Wayne Loescher, Jun-Fang Wang, Li-Jun Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Decoding Heat-Shock Responses inJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Grapevine adaptation to cold and heat stress.Journal of experimental botany · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Effects of Coverlys TF150International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Sunburn in Grapes: A Review.Frontiers in plant science · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hai-Bo LuoBeijing Key Laboratory of Viticulture and Enology, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Ling Ma
Hui-Feng Xi
Wei Duan
Shao-Hua Li
Wayne Loescher
Jun-Fang Wang
Li-Jun Wang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe electron transport chain, Rubisco and stomatal conductance are important in photosynthesis. Little is known about their combined responses to heat treatment at different temperatures and following recovery in grapevines (Vitis spp.) which are often grown in climates with high temperatures. METHODOLOGY/

findingsThe electron transport function of photosystem II, the activation state of Rubisco and the influence of stomatal behavior were investigated in grapevine leaves during heat treatments and following recovery. High temperature treatments included 35, 40 and 45°C, with 25°C as the control and recovery temperature. Heat treatment at 35°C did not significantly (P>0.05) inhibit net photosynthetic rate (P(n)). However, with treatments at 40 and 45°C, P(n) was decreased, accompanied by an increase in substomatal CO(2) concentration (C(i)), decreases in stomatal conductance (g(s)) and the activation state of Rubisco, and inhibition of the donor side and the reaction center of PSII. The acceptor side of PSII was inhibited at 45°C but not at 40°C. When grape leaves recovered following heat treatment, P(n), g(s) and the activation state of Rubisco also increased, and the donor side and the reaction center of PSII recovered. The increase in P(n) during the recovery period following the second 45°C stress was slower than that following the 40°C stress, and these increases corresponded to the donor side of PSII and the activation state of Rubisco.

conclusionsHeat treatment at 35°C did not significantly (P>0.05) influence photosynthesis. The decrease of P(n) in grape leaves exposed to more severe heat stress (40 or 45°C) was mainly attributed to three factors: the activation state of Rubisco, the donor side and the reaction center of PSII. However, the increase of P(n) in grape leaves following heat stress was also associated with a stomatal response. The acceptor side of PSII in grape leaves was responsive but less sensitive to heat stress.

Indexed as

Hot TemperatureCarbon DioxideChlorophyllElectron TransportEnzyme ActivationFluorescencePhotosynthesisPhotosystem II Protein ComplexPhotosystem I Protein ComplexPlant LeavesPlant StomataRibulose-Bisphosphate CarboxylaseVitisCarbon DioxideChlorophyllPhotosystem II Protein ComplexPhotosystem I Protein ComplexRibulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase

Identifiers

PMID21887227
PMCPMC3162573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.