Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21887058›Full record

ArticleJournal of global infectious diseases2011

Evaluation of Aro-Tal-AST Complex Protein as a Marker for Differential Diagnosis of Mycobacterium Avium Infection.

Kapil Gupta, Indu Verma, Gopal K Khuller, Rajiv Mahajan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global infectious diseases, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 90% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kapil GuptaDepartment of Biochemistry, Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda, India.
Indu Verma
Gopal K Khuller
Rajiv Mahajan
Institute of Medical Sciences · INPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeConventional diagnostic techniques for detecting Mycobacterium avium infection are far from satisfactory. As serodiagnostic tests for M. avium infection have been shown to be simple and rapid, the present study was carried out to identify and evaluate M. avium secretory protein(s) of diagnostic potential. MATERIALS AND

methodsInitially, by differential immunoblotting, a specific protein band of 45-50 kDa was recognized. Anion exchange column chromatography was used for purification of proteins. After fractionation, blast search was carried out. Further immunoreactivity studies were done with M. avium and Mycobacterium tuberculosis infected mice sera. Clinical utilization was confirmed by conducting indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with serum samples from mycobacterial infected patients.

resultsA complex of three proteins (Aro-Tal-AST) of molecular weight ~48 kDa, shown to be Aro A homologue (Aro), transaldolase (Tal) and aspartate transaminase (AST) by blast search was separated. Immunoreactivity studies of purified complex protein with mice sera confirmed it to be specific for M. avium infection. Indirect ELISA with patient samples further confirmed it to be M. avium infection specific.

conclusionAro-Tal-AST protein is specifically recognized by patients infected with M. avium and can be used as a marker for simple and rapid ELISA based tests for differential diagnosis of M. avium infection in patients with M. avium complex (MAC).

Indexed as

Differential diagnosisEnzyme-linked immunosorbent assayMycobacterium aviumSecretory proteins

Identifiers

PMID21887058
PMCPMC3162813
OpenAlexW2038478246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.