ArticleJournal of dermatological case reports2010
A case of atypical pyoderma gangrenosum.
Article in Journal of dermatological case reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPyoderma gangrenosum is a rare inflammatory disease of unknown etiology and unspecific histopathology. There are no clear-cut criteria for the diagnosis of this disease. The diagnosis is usually made based on clinical appereance, course of disease and possible, commonly coexisting disorders. In atypical cases the diagnosis is based on exclusion of other causes of similar appearing cutaneous ulcerations. MAIN OBSERVATIONS: The 67-year-old male patient, presented with a 15-year history of painful ulcers and vegetative lesions covered with sero-hemorrhagic and purulent secretions, localized on the dorsal surface of both hands leading to self-amputation of distal phalanges. We report a step-by-step The patient refers to have these complaints for more than 15 years. An extensive diagnostic procedure led to the diagnosis of pyoderma gangrenosum as a diagnosis of exclusion.
conclusionThis report shows an atypical variant of an ulcerative disease. Pyoderma gangrenosum, a diagnosis of exclusion, was sustained based on an extensive diagnostic procedure. In this article we describe the step-by-step approach which let to this diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.