ArticleJournal of dermatological case reports2008
In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy: usefulness for diagnosing hair diseases.
Article in Journal of dermatological case reports, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Monitoring the Response to JAK Inhibitor Treatment in Alopecia Areata Using Reflectance Confocal Microscopy and Videotrichoscopy: A 60-Week Observational Study.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- The Use of Imaging Techniques in the Diagnosis of Dermatoses of the Scalp.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Trichosonography: ultrasound of alopecias and hair disorders.Journal of ultrasound · 2025Review
- Line-field confocal optical coherence tomography in lichen planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia: A pilot study.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025Article
- Concordance Among In Vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy, Trichoscopy, and Histopathology in the Evaluation of Alopecia Areata Incognita.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2024Article
- Trichoscopic Patterns and Confocal Microscopy Features of Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia.Skin appendage disorders · 2023Article
- Non-Invasive Techniques for Evaluating Alopecia Areata.Maedica · 2023Article
- In vivo Diagnosis of Primary Cutaneous Amyloidosis -the Role of Reflectance Confocal Microscopy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Review
- Assessment of the usefulness of dihydrotestosterone in the diagnostics of patients with androgenetic alopecia.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2014Article
- Light microscopy of the hair: a simple tool to "untangle" hair disorders.International journal of trichology · 2011Article
- Alopecia areata developing paralell to improvement of psoriasis during ustekinumab therapy.Journal of dermatological case reports · 2010Article
- Advancements in Dermatological Imaging Modalities.Indian dermatology online journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReflectance confocal laser scanning microscopy (R-CSLM) is a new diagnostic technique which allows visualization of "optical intersections" within the epidermis and superficial layers of the dermis. Outlines of cells and their architecture are imaged and may be analyzed both horizontally and vertically to the skin surface. The method proved useful in early melanoma detection. We evaluated the potential usefulness of this method in a short series of patients with hair diseases. MAIN OBSERVATIONS: Two healthy persons and 6 patients with hair diseases (1 with alopecia areata, 1 with androgenic alopecia and 4 with genetic hair shaft abnormalities) were examined with the use of Vivascope 1500. In all patients one scalp location and one location in the mid forearm were evaluated. R-CSLM examination gave in all cases high quality images of the hair shaft intersections, at 1µm intervals, which allowed detailed analysis of the hair structure. Hair follicles could be partly visualized at a depth of up to 200µm, which allowed analysis of only superficial parts of the hair follicles. An additional hurdle was bright reflection within the follicular ostia, which decreased the perception of details in these images. Hair could be best visualized, when analyzed on flat surfaces. Receiving good quality images from convex surfaces on the scalp required additional effort from the patient (to not move) and from the physician (to obtain best possible fit of the "optic window" to the scalp).
conclusionsThese preliminary data show that R-CSLM may develop into a valuable tool in evaluation of hair shaft diseases. Further development is needed to apply this technique in abnormalities of the hair follicle and the perifollicular area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.