Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21886701›Full record

ArticleJournal of dermatological case reports2008

Response of ocular pemphigus vulgaris to therapy. Case report and review of literature.

Malgorzata Olszewska, Marta Komor, Magdalena Mazur, Tomasz Rogozinski

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dermatological case reports, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Malgorzata OlszewskaDepartment of Dermatology, Warsaw Medical School, Warsaw, Poland.
Marta Komor
Magdalena Mazur
Tomasz Rogozinski
Medical University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPemphigus vulgaris is an autoimmune bullous disease characterized by blistering and erosions within skin and mucous membranes. Lesions appear most commonly on mucosal surfaces of the oral cavity. Ocular involvement in patients with PV has rarely been reported. MAIN OBSERVATION: A 47-year-old male patient with a 2 month history of oral erosions and dysphagia developed severe conjunctivitis with periodical presence of purulent discharge, photophobia and burning sensations. The diagnosis of pemphigus vulgaris was confirmed by histopathology, direct immunofluorescence and detection of anti-desmogelin 3 antibodies in patients' serum. Treatment was introduced with prednisone at a dose of 80 mg per day (1 mg/kg) and cyclophosphamide at a dose of 100 mg daily (1.25 mg/kg). After 7 days of therapy a significant reduction of eye symptoms was observed and after 4 weeks of treatment full clinical remission was achieved.

conclusionsThe grounds for rare involvement of conjunctiva in pemphigus vulgaris is unclear. We hypothesize that inactivation of conjunctival desmoglein 3 may be compensated by other desmosomal proteins. Severe conjunctivitis may be the dominating clinical manifestation in pemphigus vulgaris. This implies a need of establishing distinct severity criteria and therapeutic standards for ocular pemphigus. In our patient rapid clinical response was achieved after introducing combined treatment with prednisone and oral cyclophosphamide.

Indexed as

conjunctival diseasescyclophosphamidedesmoglein 1desmoglein 3eye diseasespemphigus

Identifiers

PMID21886701
PMCPMC3157773
OpenAlexW2071733643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.