ArticleJournal of dermatological case reports2008
Response of ocular pemphigus vulgaris to therapy. Case report and review of literature.
Article in Journal of dermatological case reports, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ocular involvement in oral vesiculobullous diseases: A review on reported cases in the literature.The Saudi dental journal · 2024Review
- Pathological findings of pemphigus vulgaris showing giant cobblestone-like conjunctival papillae.Case reports in ophthalmology · 2013Article
- Ocular Manifestations and Management of Autoimmune Bullous Diseases.Journal of ophthalmic & vision researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPemphigus vulgaris is an autoimmune bullous disease characterized by blistering and erosions within skin and mucous membranes. Lesions appear most commonly on mucosal surfaces of the oral cavity. Ocular involvement in patients with PV has rarely been reported. MAIN OBSERVATION: A 47-year-old male patient with a 2 month history of oral erosions and dysphagia developed severe conjunctivitis with periodical presence of purulent discharge, photophobia and burning sensations. The diagnosis of pemphigus vulgaris was confirmed by histopathology, direct immunofluorescence and detection of anti-desmogelin 3 antibodies in patients' serum. Treatment was introduced with prednisone at a dose of 80 mg per day (1 mg/kg) and cyclophosphamide at a dose of 100 mg daily (1.25 mg/kg). After 7 days of therapy a significant reduction of eye symptoms was observed and after 4 weeks of treatment full clinical remission was achieved.
conclusionsThe grounds for rare involvement of conjunctiva in pemphigus vulgaris is unclear. We hypothesize that inactivation of conjunctival desmoglein 3 may be compensated by other desmosomal proteins. Severe conjunctivitis may be the dominating clinical manifestation in pemphigus vulgaris. This implies a need of establishing distinct severity criteria and therapeutic standards for ocular pemphigus. In our patient rapid clinical response was achieved after introducing combined treatment with prednisone and oral cyclophosphamide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.