Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21886484›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2011

Three distinct roles for notch in Drosophila R7 photoreceptor specification.

Andrew Tomlinson, Yannis Emmanuel Mavromatakis, Gary Struhl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Deep conservation complemented by novelty and innovation in the insect eye ground plan.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. TheDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew TomlinsonDepartment of Genetics and Development, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America. at41@columbia.edu
Yannis Emmanuel Mavromatakis
Gary Struhl
Columbia University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

RETINA--THE CONTROL OF PHOTORECEPTOR CELL FATER01EY012536 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI TOMLINSON, ANDREW · 1999 to 2011
$4.1M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNEI NIH HHS R01 EY 012536NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and Notch (N) proteins are different types of transmembrane receptors that transduce extracellular signals and control cell fate. Here we examine cell fate specification in the Drosophila retina and ask how N acts together with the RTKs Sevenless (Sev) and the EGF receptor (DER) to specify the R7 photoreceptor. The retina is composed of many hundred ommatidia, each of which grows by recruiting surrounding, undifferentiated cells and directing them to particular fates. The R7 photoreceptor derives from a cohort of three cells that are incorporated together following specification of the R2-R5 and R8 photoreceptors. Two cells of the cohort are specified as the R1/6 photoreceptor type by DER activation. These cells then activate N in the third cell (the R7 precursor). By manipulation of N and RTK signaling in diverse combinations we establish three roles for N in specifying the R7 fate. The first role is to impose a block to photoreceptor differentiation; a block that DER activation cannot overcome. The second role, paradoxically, is to negate the first; Notch activation up-regulates Sev expression, enabling the presumptive R7 cell to receive an RTK signal from R8 that can override the block. The third role is to specify the cell as an R7 rather than an R1/6 once RTK signaling has specified the cells as a photoreceptor. We speculate why N acts both to block and to facilitate photoreceptor differentiation, and provide a model for how N and RTK signaling act combinatorially to specify the R1/6 and R7 photoreceptors as well as the surrounding non-neuronal cone cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsBody PatterningCell DifferentiationCompound Eye, ArthropodDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsErbB ReceptorsEye ProteinsGene ExpressionGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalPhotoreceptor Cells, InvertebratePromoter Regions, GeneticReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, NotchRepressor ProteinsSignal TransductionDrosophila ProteinsErbB ReceptorsEye ProteinsN protein, DrosophilaReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, NotchRepressor Proteinssev protein, Drosophilattk protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID21886484
PMCPMC3160325
OpenAlexW1993575479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.