ArticleCardiopulmonary physical therapy journal2011
Physical therapy in the intensive care unit in a patient with biventricular assist device.
Article in Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Physiotherapy interventions in the ICU : Outcome-relevant measurement parameters].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2017Review
- Physical therapy management of a patient on portable extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation: a case report.Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine the safety and feasibility of early physical therapy in the intensive care unit in a patient with biventricular assist device.
methodsPhysical therapy started on the first postoperative day and continued till discharge including airway clearance, lower/upper extremity exercises, and mobilization. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), systolic/diastolic/mean arterial pressures, peripheral oxygen saturation, and double product were recorded before treatment, after treatment, and 5 minutes after treatment.
resultsIn total, 15 sessions of physical therapy were implemented for a 41-year-old male patient during 21 days following implantation of a biventricular assist device. Normal physiological responses were seen in response to treatment. Heart rate increased significantly after treatment in comparison to pretreatment values (p = 0.02) and decreased significantly after 5 minutes (p = 0.03) and approached pretreatment values. Respiratory rate increased nonsignificantly after treatment and decreased significantly after 5 minutes (p = 0.001) and approached pretreatment values.
conclusionPhysical therapy in the intensive care unit in a patient with biventricular assist device resulted in significant increases within HR and RR in physiological limits. Ongoing monitoring of vital signs is recommended in order to observe physiological responses to early physical therapeutic interventions in the intensive care unit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21886478PMC3163415W79712345What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.