Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21885772›Full record

ReviewScience (New York, N.Y.)2011

Synthetic biology: integrated gene circuits.

Nagarajan Nandagopal, Michael B Elowitz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Can thiol-based redox systems be utilized as parts for synthetic biology applications?Redox report : communications in free radical research · 2021
    Article
  20. Engineering living therapeutics with synthetic biology.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2021
    Review

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nagarajan NandagopalDepartment of Bioengineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Michael B Elowitz

Funding

THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF FUNCTIONAL MODULESP50GM068763 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI BENENSON, YAAKOV · 2003 to 2012
$28.9M
Stochastic Pulsing in Microbial Regulation and DifferentiationR01GM079771 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ELOWITZ, MICHAEL B · 2007 to 2015
$2.8M
Genetic Interactions and Synthetic Population BiologyR01GM086793 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ELOWITZ, MICHAEL B · 2010 to 2013
$1.0M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS 5R01GM079771NIGMS NIH HHS 5R01GM086793NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM068763NIGMS NIH HHS P50GM068763NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079771NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086793
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major goal of synthetic biology is to develop a deeper understanding of biological design principles from the bottom up, by building circuits and studying their behavior in cells. Investigators initially sought to design circuits "from scratch" that functioned as independently as possible from the underlying cellular system. More recently, researchers have begun to develop a new generation of synthetic circuits that integrate more closely with endogenous cellular processes. These approaches are providing fundamental insights into the regulatory architecture, dynamics, and evolution of genetic circuits and enabling new levels of control across diverse biological systems.

Indexed as

Biological PhenomenaGene Regulatory NetworksGenetic EngineeringAnimalsSignal TransductionSynthetic Biology

Identifiers

PMID21885772
PMCPMC4117316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.