Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21885057›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pediatrics2012

Dog bite prevention: an assessment of child knowledge.

Cinnamon A Dixon, E Melinda Mahabee-Gittens, Kimberly W Hart, Christopher J Lindsell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pediatrics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. US Adults' Perceptions of Dog Breed Bans, Dog Aggression and Breed-Specific Laws.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Pediatric dog bite injuries in the USA: a systematic review.World journal of pediatric surgery · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Scoping decades of dog evidence: a scoping review of dog bite-related sequelae.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Teaching Children and Parents to Understand Dog Signaling.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cinnamon A DixonDivision of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA. Cinnamon.dixon@cchmc.org
E Melinda Mahabee-Gittens
Kimberly W Hart
Christopher J Lindsell
University of Cincinnati Medical Center · USCenter for Global Health · US

Funding

CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR026314 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI HEUBI, JAMES E. · 2009 to 2011
$14.3M
Improving Parent/Adolescent Communication about TobaccoK23CA117864 · NCI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI MAHABEE-GITTENS, E. MELINDA · 2006 to 2010
$716k
NCI NIH HHS K23 CA117864NCRR NIH HHS 5UL1RR026314-03NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR026314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine what children know about preventing dog bites and to identify parental desires for dog bite prevention education. STUDY

designThis cross-sectional study sampled 5- to 15-year-olds and their parents/guardians presenting to a pediatric emergency department with nonurgent complaints or dog bites. The parent/guardian-child pairs completed surveys and knowledge-based simulated scenario tests developed on the basis of American Academy of Pediatrics and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention dog bite prevention recommendations. Regression analyses modeled knowledge test scores and probability of passing; a passing score was ≥11 of 14 questions.

resultsOf 300 parent/guardian-child pairs, 43% of children failed the knowledge test. Older children had higher odds of passing the knowledge test than younger children, as did children with white parents vs those with nonwhite parents. No associations were found between knowledge scores and other sociodemographic or experiential factors. More than 70% of children had never received dog bite prevention education, although 88% of parents desired it.

conclusionsDog bites are preventable injures that disproportionately affect children. Dog bite prevention knowledge in our sample was poor, particularly among younger children and children with nonwhite parents. Formal dog bite prevention education is warranted and welcomed by a majority of parents.

Indexed as

Animals, DomesticHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAnimalsBites and StingsChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDogsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleParentsPediatrics

Identifiers

PMID21885057
PMCPMC3258302
OpenAlexW2028913907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.