Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21884635›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical bioinformatics2011

Data mining of mental health issues of non-bone marrow donor siblings.

Morihito Takita, Yuji Tanaka, Yuko Kodama, Naoko Murashige, Nobuyo Hatanaka, Yukiko Kishi, Tomoko Matsumura, Yukio Ohsawa, Masahiro Kami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical bioinformatics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. We have a specific duty to maximise the safety of related donors.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Morihito TakitaDivision of Social Communication System for Advanced Clinical Research, the Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan. takita-ygc@umin.net.
Yuji Tanaka
Yuko Kodama
Naoko Murashige
Nobuyo Hatanaka
Yukiko Kishi
Tomoko Matsumura
Yukio Ohsawa
Masahiro Kami

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAllogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a curative treatment for patients with advanced hematologic malignancies. However, the long-term mental health issues of siblings who were not selected as donors (non-donor siblings, NDS) in the transplantation have not been well assessed. Data mining is useful in discovering new findings from a large, multidisciplinary data set and the Scenario Map analysis is a novel approach which allows extracting keywords linking different conditions/events from text data of interviews even when the keywords appeared infrequently. The aim of this study is to assess mental health issues on NDSs and to find helpful keywords for the clinical follow-up using a Scenario Map analysis.

findingsA 47-year-old woman whose younger sister had undergone allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation 20 years earlier was interviewed as a NDS. The text data from the interview transcriptions was analyzed using Scenario Mapping. Four clusters of words and six keywords were identified. Upon review of the word clusters and keywords, both the subject and researchers noticed that the subject has had mental health issues since the disease onset to date with being a NDS. The issues have been alleviated by her family.

conclusionsThis single subject study suggested the advantages of data mining in clinical follow-up for mental health issues of patients and/or their families.

Identifiers

PMID21884635
PMCPMC3164612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.