Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21884383›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on sexual and reproductive health2011

Bacterial STDs and perceived risk among sexual minority young adults.

Christine E Kaestle, Martha W Waller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sexual Minority Women's Sexual and Reproductive Health Literacy: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. HIV risk, substance use, and suicidal behaviors among Asian American lesbian and bisexual women.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2012
    Article
  12. Sexual Orientation Differences in Cervical Cancer Prevention among a Cohort of U.S. Women.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christine E KaestleDepartment of Human Development, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA. kaestle@vt.edu
Martha W Waller
Virginia Tech · US

Funding

Wave IV Data CollectionP01HD031921 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HARRIS, KATHLEEN MULLAN · 1994 to 2020
$86.1M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD031921NICHD NIH HHS P01-HD31921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextMost sexual health interventions focus on heterosexual sexual risk behavior. Health practitioners face a lack of information about the sexual health of sexual minority young adults (aged 18-26).

methodsThree indicators of sexual minority status (identity, behavior and romantic attractions) were assessed in 10,986 young adults who participated in Wave 3 of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (2001-2002). Logistic regression analyses examined associations between these indicators and individuals' perceived risk for STDs and actual infection with STDs. Data from the 1,154 respondents who had current or recent bacterial STDs were investigated further to determine whether they had underestimated their risk.

resultsOutcomes varied by sexual minority status indicator and by sex. Bisexual females had significantly higher odds of STDs than heterosexual females (odds ratios, 1.4), and females attracted to both sexes had significantly higher odds of STDs than females attracted only to males (1.8). In contrast, none of the sexual minority status indicators predicted STDs for males. Among respondents who had an STD, females who reported only same-sex sexual relationships were more likely to believe they were at very low risk for STDs than were females reporting only opposite-sex sexual relationships (17.2); homosexual females had a higher likelihood of this outcome than heterosexual females (19.7).

conclusionsHealth practitioners need to assist sexual minority young adults, particularly females, in under-standing their risk for STDs and in taking safer-sex precautions.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePerceptionAdolescentAdultComprehensionFemaleHealth SurveysHumansLogistic ModelsMaleOdds RatioRisk FactorsRisk-TakingSex FactorsSexual BehaviorSexuality

Identifiers

PMID21884383
PMCPMC3170086
OpenAlexW2144947829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.