Trial reportCardiovascular therapeutics2013
A dosing algorithm for erythropoietin alpha in older adults with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction.
Trial report in Cardiovascular therapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differences in blood volume components between hyporesponders and responders to erythropoietin alfa: the heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) anemia trial.Journal of cardiac failure · 2013Trial
- Treating anemia in older adults with heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction with epoetin alfa: single-blind randomized clinical trial of safety and efficacy.Circulation. Heart failure · 2013Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimsErythropoietin stimulating agents (ESAs) is an active area of clinical investigation in heart failure (HF) but can cause hypertension and higher hemoglobin concentrations (Hb) that have been associated with adverse outcomes. We evaluated a dosing algorithm and potential confounders' effect on Hb and blood pressure (BP) in a clinical trial.
methodsIn an ongoing randomized, placebo controlled, single blind clinical trial of ESA (epoetin alfa) in anemic patients with HF and a preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF), Hb was measured weekly as was BP, weight and concomitant medical therapy. A repeated measure mixed model evaluated determinants of weekly changes in Hb and BP.
resultsAmong 45 subjects (78 ± 11 years, 67% women, EF = 57 ± 9%) with a total of 780 repeated weekly Hb measures, Hb significantly increased over time in those assigned to ESA (β = 0.933, P < 0.0001), compared to placebo. Dose (β = -0.108, P < 0.0001), patient weight (β = -0.016, P = 0.0037), diuretic use (β = -0.124, P = 0.0389), and time (β = 0.003, P = 0.0331), were all significantly associated with Hb change. Increased diuretic dose and weight change were significantly inversely associated with changes in Hb. ESA administration and dose were not significant determinants of absolute BP or changes in BP from baseline. DISCUSSION: In addition to ESA dose and duration of therapy, factors indicative of volume status including weight and diuretic use are determinants of hemoglobin levels in HF subjects.
conclusionThe currently employed dosing algorithm, which adjusts the administration of ESA based on the absolute hemoglobin and weekly change in hemoglobin increases Hb with relatively a low weekly dose of ESA without significant effects on BP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.