Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21882361›Full record

ReviewAutism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research2011

The autism diagnosis in translation: shared affect in children and mouse models of ASD.

Somer L Bishop, Garet P Lahvis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Eliciting and Analyzing Male Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalization (USV) Songs.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Best behaviour? Ontologies and the formal description of animal behaviour.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2015
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Somer L BishopCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC), Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Ohio, USA.
Garet P Lahvis
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING IN MENTAL RETARDATION RESEARCHT32HD007489 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Sigan L Hartley · 1995 to 2026
$6.0M
Social Approach Behaviors and Reward Pathways of Adolescent MiceR01DA022543 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI LAHVIS, GARET PAUL · 2006 to 2010
$1.6M
2/2 Development of a Screening Interview for Research Studies of ASDR01HD065277 · NICHD · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI BISHOP, SOMER L. · 2009 to 2010
$737k
Exploring Endophenotypes of Mouse Social BehaviorR03HD046716 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI LAHVIS, GARET PAUL · 2005 to 2006
$144k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD065277NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD046716NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007489NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD07489NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA022543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the absence of molecular biomarkers that can be used to diagnose ASD, current diagnostic tools depend upon clinical assessments of behavior. Research efforts with human subjects have successfully utilized standardized diagnostic instruments, which include clinician interviews with parents and direct observation of the children themselves [Risi et al., 2006]. However, because clinical instruments are semi-structured and rely heavily on dynamic social processes and clinical skill, scores from these measures do not necessarily lend themselves directly to experimental investigations into the causes of ASD. Studies of the neurobiology of autism require experimental animal models. Mice are particularly useful for elucidating genetic and toxicological contributions to impairments in social function [Halladay et al., 2009]. Behavioral tests have been developed that are relevant to autism [Crawley, 2004, 2007], including measures of repetitive behaviors [Lewis, Tanimura, Lee, & Bodfish, 2007; Moy et al., 2008], social behavior [Brodkin, 2007; Lijam et al., 1997; Moretti, Bouwknecht, Teague, Paylor, & Zoghbi, 2005], and vocal communication [D'Amato et al., 2005; Panksepp et al., 2007; Scattoni et al., 2008]. Advances also include development of high-throughput measures of mouse sociability that can be used to reliably compare inbred mouse strains [Moy et al., 2008; Nadler et al., 2004], as well as measures of social reward [Panksepp & Lahvis, 2007] and empathy [Chen, Panksepp, & Lahvis, 2009; Langford et al., 2006]. With continued generation of mouse gene-targeted mice that are directly relevant to genetic linkages in ASD, there remains an urgent need to utilize a full suite of mouse behavioral tests that allows for a comprehensive assessment of the spectrum of social difficulties relevant to ASD. Using impairments in shared affect as an example, this paper explores potential avenues for collaboration between clinical and basic scientists, within an amply considered translational framework.

Indexed as

AffectAnimalsAutistic DisorderBehavior, AnimalChildChild BehaviorChild, PreschoolDisease Models, AnimalHumansInfantMiceMice, Inbred StrainsNonverbal CommunicationSocial BehaviorVocalization, Animal

Identifiers

PMID21882361
PMCPMC3684385
OpenAlexW2080498961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.