Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21881918›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2012

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of dasatinib and cetuximab in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

Athanassios Argiris, Trevor M Feinstein, Lin Wang, Tianbing Yang, Shruti Agrawal, Leonard J Appleman, Ronald G Stoller, Jennifer R Grandis, Ann Marie Egloff

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Cetuximab and bevacizumab: preclinical data and phase II trial in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2013
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Athanassios ArgirisDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Argiris@uthscsa.edu
Trevor M Feinstein
Lin Wang
Tianbing Yang
Shruti Agrawal
Leonard J Appleman
Ronald G Stoller
Jennifer R Grandis
Ann Marie Egloff

Funding

WILD TYPE P53-BASED ADJUVANT IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR SCCHNP50CA097190 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CHRISTOPHER J. BAKKENIST · 2004 to 2026
$49.6M
STAT-Mediated TGFalpha EGFR Signaling in squamous cell carcinoma of head neckR01CA077308 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GRANDIS, JENNIFER RUBIN · 1998 to 2018
$5.0M
GRPR Signaling in SCCHN: Integration with EGFRR01CA098372 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GRANDIS, JENNIFER RUBIN · 2004 to 2017
$3.8M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097190NCI NIH HHS R01 CA077308NCI NIH HHS R01 CA098372
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCombined inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Src family kinases (SFK) may lead to improved therapeutic effects. We evaluated the combination of dasatinib, an inhibitor of SFK and other kinases, and cetuximab, an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with advanced solid malignancies received cetuximab intravenously on a standard weekly schedule and dasatinib orally, once daily at 3 dose levels: (1) 100 mg, (2) 150 mg, (3) 200 mg. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of dasatinib were performed prior to starting cetuximab and following 14 days of treatment.

resultsTwenty-five patients (3 dose level 1; 19 dose level 2; 3 dose level 3) were initially treated. Three patients developed dose-limiting toxicities: 1 at dose level 2 (headache) and 2 at dose level 3 (headache, nausea). Grade 3-4 toxicities in more than 2 patients included: dyspnea (4), vomiting (4), nausea (3), hypersensitivity reactions (3), headache (3) and anemia (3). Twenty-one patients developed headache (8 grade 1; 10 grade 2), which occurred after the loading of cetuximab and lasted 1-3 days. Six additional patients were treated with dasatinib starting 3 days after the loading dose of cetuximab; none developed headache after dasatinib. Dasatinib pharmacokinetics and a transient decrease in SFK PY416 levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were not altered by cetuximab. Patients with higher plasma TGF-alpha levels had worse progression-free survival.

conclusionsDasatinib 150 mg once daily plus weekly cetuximab is recommended for phase II studies. Early-onset headache was ameliorated by starting dasatinib after cetuximab.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCetuximabDasatinibDisease-Free SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsCetuximabDasatinibProto-Oncogene Proteins pp60(c-src)PyrimidinesThiazolesTransforming Growth Factor alpha

Identifiers

PMID21881918
PMCPMC3402509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.