Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21880918›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2011

Sound rhythms are encoded by postinhibitory rebound spiking in the superior paraolivary nucleus.

Richard A Felix, Anders Fridberger, Sara Leijon, Albert S Berrebi, Anna K Magnusson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Dynamic Heterogeneity Shapes Patterns of Spiral Ganglion Activity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard A FelixDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head Neck Surgery and Sensory Neuroscience Research Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506-9303, USA.
Anders Fridberger
Sara Leijon
Albert S Berrebi
Anna K Magnusson
Karolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SEWest Virginia University · US

Funding

NEURONS AND CIRCUITS OF PERIOLIVARY NUCLEIR01DC002266 · NIDCD · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI BERREBI, ALBERT S · 2002 to 2013
$2.8M
Research Training Program in the Behavioral and Biomedical SciencesT32GM081741 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI BERREBI, ALBERT S, SIMPKINS, JAMES W. · 2008 to 2018
$2.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC-002266NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC002266NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM081741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The superior paraolivary nucleus (SPON) is a prominent structure in the auditory brainstem. In contrast to the principal superior olivary nuclei with identified roles in processing binaural sound localization cues, the role of the SPON in hearing is not well understood. A combined in vitro and in vivo approach was used to investigate the cellular properties of SPON neurons in the mouse. Patch-clamp recordings in brain slices revealed that brief and well timed postinhibitory rebound spiking, generated by the interaction of two subthreshold-activated ion currents, is a hallmark of SPON neurons. The I(h) current determines the timing of the rebound, whereas the T-type Ca(2+) current boosts the rebound to spike threshold. This precisely timed rebound spiking provides a physiological explanation for the sensitivity of SPON neurons to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) tones in vivo, where peaks in the sound envelope drive inhibitory inputs and SPON neurons fire action potentials during the waveform troughs. Consistent with this notion, SPON neurons display intrinsic tuning to frequency-modulated sinusoidal currents (1-15Hz) in vitro and discharge with strong synchrony to SAMs with modulation frequencies between 1 and 20 Hz in vivo. The results of this study suggest that the SPON is particularly well suited to encode rhythmic sound patterns. Such temporal periodicity information is likely important for detection of communication cues, such as the acoustic envelopes of animal vocalizations and speech signals.

Indexed as

SoundAcoustic StimulationAction PotentialsAnesthetics, LocalAnimalsAnimals, NewbornAuditory PathwaysBiophysicsCalciumCalcium Channel BlockersCyclic Nucleotide-Gated Cation ChannelsElectric StimulationFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHyperpolarization-Activated Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated ChannelsIn Vitro TechniquesAnesthetics, LocalCalciumCalcium Channel BlockersCyclic Nucleotide-Gated Cation ChannelsHyperpolarization-Activated Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated ChannelsICI D2788Ion ChannelsLidocaineMibefradilPotassium ChannelsPyrimidinesQX-314Tetrodotoxin

Identifiers

PMID21880918
PMCPMC3712520
OpenAlexW2117355650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.