ArticleMolecular pharmacology2011
Developing chemical genetic approaches to explore G protein-coupled receptor function: validation of the use of a receptor activated solely by synthetic ligand (RASSL).
Article in Molecular pharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chemogenetic Tools and their Use in Studies of Neuropsychiatric Disorders.Physiological research · 2024Review
- Chemogenetic approaches to identify metabolically important GPCR signaling pathways: Therapeutic implications.Journal of neurochemistry · 2021Review
- Designer GPCRs as Novel Tools to Identify Metabolically Important Signaling Pathways.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Article
- Restoring Agonist Function at a Chemogenetically Modified MACS chemical neuroscience · 2020Article
- Preassembled GPCR signaling complexes mediate distinct cellular responses to ultralow ligand concentrations.Science signaling · 2018Article
- Muscarinic receptor oligomerization.Neuropharmacology · 2018Review
- Cholecystokinin 1 Receptor - A UniqueFrontiers in physiology · 2018Article
- Critical Role for GFrontiers in psychiatry · 2018Article
- Visualization of ligand-induced dopamine DScientific reports · 2017Article
- Gs-DREADD Knock-In Mice for Tissue-Specific, Temporal Stimulation of Cyclic AMP Signaling.Molecular and cellular biology · 2017Article
- Methods used to study the oligomeric structure of G-protein-coupled receptors.Bioscience reports · 2017Review
- Optogenetic approaches for dissecting neuromodulation and GPCR signaling in neural circuits.Current opinion in pharmacology · 2017Review
- Deciphering and modulating G protein signalling in C. elegans using the DREADD technology.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- A G Protein-biased Designer G Protein-coupled Receptor Useful for Studying the Physiological Relevance of Gq/11-dependent Signaling Pathways.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2016Article
- Article
- Optical probes based on G protein-coupled receptors - added work or added value?British journal of pharmacology · 2016Review
- Distinct Agonist Regulation of Muscarinic Acetylcholine M2-M3 Heteromers and Their Corresponding Homomers.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2015Article
- A Broad G Protein-Coupled Receptor Internalization Assay that Combines SNAP-Tag Labeling, Diffusion-Enhanced Resonance Energy Transfer, and a Highly Emissive Terbium Cryptate.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2015Article
- Novel insights into M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor physiology and structure.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2014Review
- A novel experimental strategy to assess the metabolic effects of selective activation of a G(q)-coupled receptor in hepatocytes in vivo.Endocrinology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Molecular evolution and chemical genetics have been applied to generate functional pairings of mutated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and nonendogenous ligands. These mutant receptors, referred to as receptors activated solely by synthetic ligands (RASSLs) or designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs), have huge potential to define physiological roles of GPCRs and to validate receptors in animal models as therapeutic targets to treat human disease. However, appreciation of ligand bias and functional selectivity of different ligands at the same receptor suggests that RASSLs may signal differently than wild-type receptors activated by endogenous agonists. We assessed this by generating forms of wild-type human M(3) muscarinic receptor and a RASSL variant that responds selectively to clozapine N-oxide. Although the RASSL receptor had reduced affinity for muscarinic antagonists, including atropine, stimulation with clozapine N-oxide produced effects very similar to those generated by acetylcholine at the wild-type M(3)-receptor. Such effects included the relative movement of the third intracellular loop and C-terminal tail of intramolecular fluorescence resonance energy transfer sensors and the ability of the wild type and evolved mutant to regulate extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 phosphorylation. Each form interacted similarly with β-arrestin 2 and was internalized from the cell surface in response to the appropriate ligand. Furthermore, the pattern of phosphorylation of specific serine residues within the evolved receptor in response to clozapine N-oxide was very similar to that produced by acetylcholine at the wild type. Such results provide confidence that, at least for the M(3) muscarinic receptor, results obtained after transgenic expression of this RASSL are likely to mirror the actions of acetylcholine at the wild type receptor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.