Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2011
A trial of an impedance threshold device in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Prehospital Resuscitation Using an Impedance Valve and Early Versus Delayed Analysis
Cardiac Arrest Bundle of Care Trial
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 221 citations in OpenAlex.
- Public Approval of Exception From Informed Consent in Emergency Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Community Consultation Surveys.JAMA network open · 2019Pooled it
- Optimal Combination of Compression Rate and Depth During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Functionally Favorable Survival.JAMA cardiology · 2019Trial
- Variations in the application of exception from informed consent in a multicenter clinical trial.Resuscitation · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Association of early withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for perceived neurological prognosis with mortality after cardiac arrest.Resuscitation · 2016Trial
- Design and implementation of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Pragmatic Airway Resuscitation Trial (PART).Resuscitation · 2016Trial
- Expanding Paramedicine in the Community (EPIC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials · 2014Trial
- Early coronary angiography and induced hypothermia are associated with survival and functional recovery after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Resuscitation · 2014Trial
- The impact of peri-shock pause on survival from out-of-hospital shockable cardiac arrest during the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium PRIMED trial.Resuscitation · 2014Trial
- Methodology of the Field Administration of Stroke Therapy - Magnesium (FAST-MAG) phase 3 trial: Part 2 - prehospital study methods.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2014Trial
- Treatment of non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with active compression decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus an impedance threshold device.Resuscitation · 2013Trial
- Early versus later rhythm analysis in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.The New England journal of medicine · 2011Trial
- Does out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival differ by EMS agency type in the U.S.? Insights from the CARES registry.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Effects of head-up CPR on survival and neurological outcomes: A systematic review.Resuscitation plus · 2025Review
- Spaceflight Associated Neuro-ocular Syndrome (SANS) and its countermeasures.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2025Review
- The outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest based on the etiology of cardiac arrest; A scoping review.PloS one · 2025Article
- Review
- Physiology-Guided Resuscitation: Monitoring and Augmenting Perfusion during Cardiopulmonary Arrest.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Effect of automated head-thorax elevation during chest compressions on lung ventilation: a model study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
28 authors at 16 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe impedance threshold device (ITD) is designed to enhance venous return and cardiac output during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by increasing the degree of negative intrathoracic pressure. Previous studies have suggested that the use of an ITD during CPR may improve survival rates after cardiac arrest.
methodsWe compared the use of an active ITD with that of a sham ITD in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who underwent standard CPR at 10 sites in the United States and Canada. Patients, investigators, study coordinators, and all care providers were unaware of the treatment assignments. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge with satisfactory function (i.e., a score of ≤3 on the modified Rankin scale, which ranges from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability).
resultsOf 8718 patients included in the analysis, 4345 were randomly assigned to treatment with a sham ITD and 4373 to treatment with an active device. A total of 260 patients (6.0%) in the sham-ITD group and 254 patients (5.8%) in the active-ITD group met the primary outcome (risk difference adjusted for sequential monitoring, -0.1 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -1.1 to 0.8; P=0.71). There were also no significant differences in the secondary outcomes, including rates of return of spontaneous circulation on arrival at the emergency department, survival to hospital admission, and survival to hospital discharge.
conclusionsUse of the ITD did not significantly improve survival with satisfactory function among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest receiving standard CPR. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; ROC PRIMED ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00394706.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.