Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21879388›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2012

Comparative investigations on in vitro serum stability of polymeric micelle formulations.

Tobias Miller, Reinhard Rachel, Ahmed Besheer, Senta Uezguen, Markus Weigandt, Achim Goepferich

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. DNA Nanotechnology Enters Cell Membranes.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Dendritic PEG outer shells enhance serum stability of polymeric micelles.Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tobias MillerExploratory Pharmaceutical Development, Merck KGaA, Frankfurter Straße 250, 64293, Darmstadt, Germany.
Reinhard Rachel
Ahmed Besheer
Senta Uezguen
Markus Weigandt
Achim Goepferich

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeStability of polymeric micelles upon injection is essential for a drug delivery system but is not fully understood. We optimized an analytical test allowing quantification of micellar stability in biofluids and applied it to a variety of block copolymer micelles with different hydrophobic block architechtures.

methodsPolymeric micelles were prepared from four different polymers and investigated via encapsulation of two fluorescent dyes. Samples were incubated in human serum; changes in Foerster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) were recorded as a function of time. This fluorescence-based approach was supported semi-quantitatively by results from Asymmetrical Flow Field-Flow-Fractionation (AF4).

resultsAfter incubation experiments, micellar stability was determined by calculation of two stability-indicating parameters: residual micellar fractions (RMFs) and in vitro serum half-lives. Both parameters showed that PEG-PVPy micelles rapidly destabilized after 3 h (RMF < 45%), whereas PEG-PLA, PEG-PLGA and PEG-PCL micelles were far more stable (RMFs 65 to 98%).

conclusionThis FRET-based assay is a valuable tool in evaluating and screening serum stability of polymeric micelles and revealed low serum stability of PEG-PVPy micelles compared to polyester-based micelles.

Indexed as

MicellesDrug CarriersHumansPolymersSerumSolubilityDrug CarriersMicellesPolymers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.