Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21878677›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the National Cancer Institute2011

Menopausal hormone therapy and risks of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers: women's health initiative randomized trials.

Jean Y Tang, Katrina M Spaunhurst, Rowan T Chlebowski, Jean Wactawski-Wende, Elizabeth Keiser, Fridtjof Thomas, Matthew L Anderson, Nathalie C Zeitouni, Joseph C Larson, Marcia L Stefanick

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Long-term hormone therapy for perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. A Narrative Review of the Role of Estrogen (Receptors) in Melanoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Repurposing clinical trial data for skin cancer aetiology.The British journal of dermatology · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Female Estrogen-Related Factors and Incidence of Basal Cell Carcinoma in a Nationwide US Cohort.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Age at first birth and melanoma risk: a meta-analysis.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2014
    Article
  20. Is oestrogen an important player in melanoma progression?Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Jean Y TangDepartment of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 450 Broadway, Pavilion C, MC 5334, Redwood City, CA 94305, USA. tangy@stanford.edu
Katrina M Spaunhurst
Rowan T Chlebowski
Jean Wactawski-Wende
Elizabeth Keiser
Fridtjof Thomas
Matthew L Anderson
Nathalie C Zeitouni
Joseph C Larson
Marcia L Stefanick
Stanford University · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · USBaylor College of Medicine · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USStanford Medicine · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

CTSA: K12 COMPONENTKL2RR024130 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JOHNSTON, S. CLAIBORNE · 2006 to 2011
$19.3M
VANGUARD CENTER FOR WOMENS HEALTH INITIATIVEN01WH032108 · WH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI GREENLAND, PHILIP · 1993 to 2000
$919k
Chemoprevention of basal cell carcinoma with vitamin DK23AR056736 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI TANG, JEAN Y · 2009 to 2012
$497k
NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR024130NIAMS NIH HHS 1K23AR056736-01NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR056736WHI NIH HHS N01-WH-32108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCase-control studies have reported that exogenous estrogen use is associated with increased risk of skin cancer. The effects of menopausal hormone therapy on incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer and melanoma were evaluated in post hoc analyses of the Women's Health Initiative randomized placebo-controlled hormone therapy trials of combined estrogen plus progestin (E + P) and estrogen only (E-alone).

methodsPostmenopausal women aged 50-79 years were randomly assigned to conjugated equine estrogen (0.625 mg/d) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (2.5 mg/d) or placebo in the E + P trial if they had an intact uterus (N = 16,608) or to conjugated equine estrogen alone or placebo in the E-alone trial if they had a hysterectomy (N = 10,739); the mean follow-up was 5.6 and 7.1 years, respectively. Incident nonmelanoma skin cancers (n = 980 [E + P trial]; n = 820 [E-alone trial]) and melanomas (n = 57 [E + P trial]; n =38 [E-alone trial]) were ascertained by self-report. Incident cases of cutaneous malignant melanoma were confirmed by physician review of medical records. Incidences of nonmelanoma skin cancer and melanoma were compared between the two randomization groups within each trial using hazard ratios (HRs), with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and Wald statistic P values from Cox proportional hazards models. All statistical tests were two-sided.

resultsRates of incident nonmelanoma skin cancer and melanoma were similar between the active hormone (combined analysis of E + P and E-alone) and placebo groups (nonmelanoma skin cancer: HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.89 to 1.07; melanoma: HR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.61 to 1.37). Results were similar for the E + P and E-alone trials when analyzed individually.

conclusionsMenopausal hormone therapy did not affect overall incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer or melanoma. These findings do not support a role of menopausal estrogen, with or without progestin, in the development of skin cancer in postmenopausal women.

Indexed as

MenopauseAgedConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicEstrogen Replacement TherapyEstrogens, Conjugated (USP)FemaleHumansIncidenceKaplan-Meier EstimateMedroxyprogesterone AcetateMelanomaMiddle AgedOdds RatioProportional Hazards ModelsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsEstrogens, Conjugated (USP)Medroxyprogesterone Acetate

Identifiers

PMID21878677
PMCPMC3186783
OpenAlexW2124943672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.