Trial reportCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2012
Hemispheric specialization for movement control produces dissociable differences in online corrections after stroke.
Trial report in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 139 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Article
- The role of cognitive load on motor performance of the ipsilesional arm in stroke survivors with severe hemiparesis.Topics in stroke rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Neural mechanisms of handedness for precision drawing: hand-dependent engagement of cortical networks for bimanual control and tool use.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A pilot study for self-guided, active robotic training of proprioception of the upper limb in chronic stroke.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Cortical neural activity during responses to mechanical perturbation: Effects of hand preference and hand used.NeuroImage · 2025Article
- Implications of Intra-Individual Variability in Motor Performance on Functional Mobility in Stroke Survivors.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The complementary dominance hypothesis: a model for remediating the 'good' hand in stroke survivors.The Journal of physiology · 2025Review
- The role of cognitive load on interlimb differences in motor coordination in older adults.Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Force drifts and matching errors in the lower extremities: implications for the control and perception of foot force.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
- Prosthetic home intervention induces cortical plasticity in paediatrics with congenital limb reduction.Brain communications · 2024Article
- Differences in kinetic factors affecting gait speed between lesion sides in patients with stroke.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- A robot-based interception task to quantify upper limb impairments in proprioceptive and visual feedback after stroke.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Directional and general impairments in initiating motor responses after stroke.Brain communications · 2023Article
- Brain Asymmetry and Its Effects on Gait Strategies in Hemiplegic Patients: New Rehabilitative Conceptions.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Ipsilesional arm training in severe stroke to improve functional independence (IPSI): phase II protocol.BMC neurology · 2022Article
- Does exposure to startle impact voluntary reaching movements in individuals with severe-to-moderate stroke?Experimental brain research · 2021Article
- Remedial Training of the Less-Impaired Arm in Chronic Stroke Survivors With Moderate to Severe Upper-Extremity Paresis Improves Functional Independence: A Pilot Study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Synergistic Activation Patterns of Hand Muscles in Left-and Right-Hand Dominant Individuals.Journal of human kinetics · 2021Article
- Left hemisphere damage produces deficits in predictive control of bilateral coordination.Experimental brain research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we examine whether corrections made during an ongoing movement are differentially affected by left hemisphere damage (LHD) and right hemisphere damage (RHD). Our hypothesis of motor lateralization proposes that control mechanisms specialized to the right hemisphere rely largely on online processes, while the left hemisphere primarily utilizes predictive mechanisms to specify optimal coordination patterns. We therefore predict that RHD, but not LHD, should impair online correction when task goals are unexpectedly changed. Fourteen stroke subjects (7 LHD, 7 RHD) and 14 healthy controls reached to 1 of the 3 targets that unexpectedly "jumped" during movement onset. RHD subjects showed a considerable delay in initiating the corrective response relative to controls and LHD subjects. However, both stroke groups made large final position errors on the target jump trials. Position deficits following LHD were associated with poor intersegmental coordination, while RHD subjects had difficulty terminating their movements appropriately. These findings confirm that RHD, but not LHD, produces a deficit in the timing of online corrections and also indicate that both stroke groups show position deficits that are related to the specialization of their damaged hemisphere. Further research is needed to identify specific neural circuits within each hemisphere critical for these processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.