Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21878421›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental health perspectives2012

European birth cohorts for environmental health research.

Martine Vrijheid, Maribel Casas, Anna Bergström, Amanda Carmichael, Sylvaine Cordier, Merete Eggesbø, Esben Eller, Maria P Fantini, Mariana F Fernández, Ana Fernández-Somoano and 30 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental health perspectives, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. What is next for occupational cancer epidemiology?Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

40 authors.

Martine VrijheidCentre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology, Doctor Aiguader 88, Barcelona, Spain. mvrijheid@creal.cat
Maribel Casas
Anna Bergström
Amanda Carmichael
Sylvaine Cordier
Merete Eggesbø
Esben Eller
Maria P Fantini
Mariana F Fernández
Ana Fernández-Somoano
Ulrike Gehring
Regina Grazuleviciene
Cynthia Hohmann
Anne M Karvonen
Thomas Keil
Manolis Kogevinas
Gudrun Koppen
Ursula Krämer
Claudia E Kuehni
Per Magnus
Renata Majewska
Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen
Evridiki Patelarou
Maria Skaalum Petersen
Frank H Pierik
Kinga Polanska
Daniela Porta
Lorenzo Richiardi
Ana Cristina Santos
Rémy Slama
Radim J Sram
Carel Thijs
Christina Tischer
Gunnar Toft
Tomáš Trnovec
Stephanie Vandentorren
Tanja G M Vrijkotte
Michael Wilhelm
John Wright
Mark Nieuwenhuijsen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany pregnancy and birth cohort studies investigate the health effects of early-life environmental contaminant exposure. An overview of existing studies and their data is needed to improve collaboration, harmonization, and future project planning.

objectivesOur goal was to create a comprehensive overview of European birth cohorts with environmental exposure data.

methodsBirth cohort studies were included if they a) collected data on at least one environmental exposure, b) started enrollment during pregnancy or at birth, c) included at least one follow-up point after birth, d) included at least 200 mother-child pairs, and e) were based in a European country. A questionnaire collected information on basic protocol details and exposure and health outcome assessments, including specific contaminants, methods and samples, timing, and number of subjects. A full inventory can be searched on www.birthcohortsenrieco.net.

resultsQuestionnaires were completed by 37 cohort studies of > 350,000 mother-child pairs in 19 European countries. Only three cohorts did not participate. All cohorts collected biological specimens of children or parents. Many cohorts collected information on passive smoking (n = 36), maternal occupation (n = 33), outdoor air pollution (n = 27), and allergens/biological organisms (n = 27). Fewer cohorts (n = 12-19) collected information on water contamination, ionizing or nonionizing radiation exposures, noise, metals, persistent organic pollutants, or other pollutants. All cohorts have information on birth outcomes; nearly all on asthma, allergies, childhood growth and obesity; and 26 collected information on child neurodevelopment.

conclusionCombining forces in this field will yield more efficient and conclusive studies and ultimately improve causal inference. This impressive resource of existing birth cohort data could form the basis for longer-term and worldwide coordination of research on environment and child health.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualEnvironmental HealthMaternal ExposureChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesEnvironmental ExposureEuropeFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInternetPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID21878421
PMCPMC3261945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.