Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21876650›Full record

ArticleClinical medicine. Pathology2008

Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinomas; analysis of a large database.

Mitchell S Wachtel, Yan Zhang, Tom Xu, Maurizio Chiriva-Internati, Eldo E Frezza

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical medicine. Pathology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Update on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Combined Hepatocellular Cholangiocarcinoma.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The clinicopathological features of combined primary hepatic adenosquamous-hepatocellular carcinoma.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mitchell S WachtelDepartment of Pathology.
Yan Zhang
Tom Xu
Maurizio Chiriva-Internati
Eldo E Frezza
Texas Tech University · USTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimCombined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (combined tumor) has been described as either a variant of hepatoma or a variant of cholangiocarcinoma. Prior studies evaluated fewer than 50 patients with combined tumors, precluding multivariate analyses. Posited was the notion that analysis of a large database would yield more definite answers.

methodsThis study used SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program of the National Cancer Institute) to analyze 282 combined tumors, 2,035 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, and 19,336 hepatomas between the years 1973-2003. Multinomial logit regression calculated point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (c.i.) for relative risk (rr). Cox regression calculated point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (c.i.) for hazard ratios (ĥ).

resultsMen less often had cholangiocarcinomas than they had combined tumors (rr = 0.63, c.i. = 0.49-0.81). Hepatomas less often than combined tumors presented with distant spread (rr = 0.56, c.i. = 0.43-0.72). Men (rr = 1.50, c.i. = 1.17-1.93) and patients with a known Asian or Pacific birthplace (rr = 2.36, c.i. = 1.56-3.56) more often had hepatomas than they had combined tumors. Among patients not known to have an Asian/Pacific birthplace, a diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma (ĥ = 0.72, c.i. = 0.63-0.82) or hepatoma (ĥ = 0.75, c.i. = 0.66-0.86) provided a better prognosis than did a diagnosis of combined tumor.

conclusionCombined tumors differ from hepatomas and cholangiocarcinomas in terms of distribution and survival patterns in the population; they should be considered neither cholangiocarcinomas nor hepatomas.

Indexed as

cholangiocarcinomacombined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinomahepatomamultinomial logitsurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID21876650
PMCPMC3160004
OpenAlexW1544697940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.