Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21876136›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2011

Bayesian design of synthetic biological systems.

Chris P Barnes, Daniel Silk, Xia Sheng, Michael P H Stumpf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Chaos in synthetic microbial communities.PLoS computational biology · 2022
    Article
  8. Stability selection enables robust learning of differential equations from limited noisy data.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Mathematical Modelling in Plant Synthetic Biology.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Modeling cell population dynamics.In silico biology · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Rapid acquisition and model-based analysis of cell-free transcription-translation reactions from nonmodel bacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. LScientific reports · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chris P BarnesCenter for Bioinformatics, Division of Molecular Biosciences, Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom. christopher.barnes@imperial.ac.uk
Daniel Silk
Xia Sheng
Michael P H Stumpf

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C519670/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F005210/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G007934/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G020434/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we introduce a new design framework for synthetic biology that exploits the advantages of Bayesian model selection. We will argue that the difference between inference and design is that in the former we try to reconstruct the system that has given rise to the data that we observe, whereas in the latter, we seek to construct the system that produces the data that we would like to observe, i.e., the desired behavior. Our approach allows us to exploit methods from Bayesian statistics, including efficient exploration of models spaces and high-dimensional parameter spaces, and the ability to rank models with respect to their ability to generate certain types of data. Bayesian model selection furthermore automatically strikes a balance between complexity and (predictive or explanatory) performance of mathematical models. To deal with the complexities of molecular systems we employ an approximate Bayesian computation scheme which only requires us to simulate from different competing models to arrive at rational criteria for choosing between them. We illustrate the advantages resulting from combining the design and modeling (or in silico prototyping) stages currently seen as separate in synthetic biology by reference to deterministic and stochastic model systems exhibiting adaptive and switch-like behavior, as well as bacterial two-component signaling systems.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremSynthetic BiologySystems BiologyAdaptation, PhysiologicalBacteriaStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID21876136
PMCPMC3174594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.