Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21875760›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology2012

Skin cancer risk perceptions: a comparison across ethnicity, age, education, gender, and income.

Kesha J Buster, Zhiying You, Mona Fouad, Craig Elmets

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Efficacy of a sun protection workbook for kidney transplant recipients: a randomized controlled trial of a culturally sensitive educational intervention.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2014
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kesha J BusterDepartment of Dermatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-0009, USA. kbuster07@yahoo.com
Zhiying You
Mona Fouad
Craig Elmets

Funding

UAB Skin Diseases Research CenterP30AR050948 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI TIMARES, LAURA · 2004 to 2013
$5.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR050948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies of noncutaneous and cutaneous malignancies support the hypothesis that poor risk-perception status contributes to health disparity.

objectiveWe evaluated skin cancer (SC) risk perceptions across race and other demographic markers using the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) and compared them to discover differences in perception that may contribute to the disparities in SC diagnosis and treatment.

methodsRespondents with no history of SC were randomly selected to answer questions assessing perceived risk and knowledge of preventive strategies of SC. Logistic regression was performed to identify associations between perceptions of SC and demographic variables including self-described race, age, sex, education, income, and health insurance status.

resultsBlacks, the elderly, and people with less education perceived themselves as at lower risk of developing SC. They, along with Hispanics, were also more likely to believe that one cannot lower their SC risk and that there are so many different recommendations on how to prevent SC that it makes it difficult to know which ones to follow. Lower education also correlated with greater reluctance to have a skin examination. LIMITATIONS: HINTS is a cross-sectional instrument, thus it only provides a snapshot of SC perceptions.

conclusionUncertainty and altered perceptions are more common in the SC risk perceptions of ethnic minorities, the elderly, and those with less education. These are the same groups that are subject to disparities in SC outcomes. Educational programs directed at these demographic groups may help to reduce the SC-related health disparities.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsAlabamaAttitude to HealthCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusEthnicityFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIncomeLogistic ModelsMale

Identifiers

PMID21875760
PMCPMC3766358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.