Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21875439›Full record

ReviewJournal of translational medicine2011

An immunologic portrait of cancer.

Maria Libera Ascierto, Valeria De Giorgi, Qiuzhen Liu, Davide Bedognetti, Tara L Spivey, Daniela Murtas, Lorenzo Uccellini, Ben D Ayotte, David F Stroncek, Lotfi Chouchane and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Propionate promotes CD8Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Differential regulation and function of tumor-infiltrating T cells in different stages of breast cancer patients.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Oncoimmunology · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Impact of carbon nanotubes and graphene on immune cells.Journal of translational medicine · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Maria Libera AsciertoInfectious Disease and Immunogenetics Section (IDIS), Department of Transfusion Medicine, Clinical Center and Trans-NIH Center for Human Immunology (CHI), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Valeria De Giorgi
Qiuzhen Liu
Davide Bedognetti
Tara L Spivey
Daniela Murtas
Lorenzo Uccellini
Ben D Ayotte
David F Stroncek
Lotfi Chouchane
Masoud H Manjili
Ena Wang
Francesco M Marincola
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center · USCornell University · USNorthern Michigan University · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Immunogenetic Study of Infectious Diseases and CancerZIACL002118 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI MARINCOLA, FRANCESCO M · 2009 to 2012
$0k
Develop novel assays for assessing cellular and gene therapiesZIACL002119 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI STRONCEK, DAVID · 2010 to 2025
$0k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of high-throughput technology challenges the traditional histopathological classification of cancer, and proposes new taxonomies derived from global transcriptional patterns. Although most of these molecular re-classifications did not endure the test of time, they provided bulk of new information that can reframe our understanding of human cancer biology. Here, we focus on an immunologic interpretation of cancer that segregates oncogenic processes independent from their tissue derivation into at least two categories of which one bears the footprints of immune activation. Several observations describe a cancer phenotype where the expression of interferon stimulated genes and immune effector mechanisms reflect patterns commonly observed during the inflammatory response against pathogens, which leads to elimination of infected cells. As these signatures are observed in growing cancers, they are not sufficient to entirely clear the organism of neoplastic cells but they sustain, as in chronic infections, a self-perpetuating inflammatory process. Yet, several studies determined an association between this inflammatory status and a favorable natural history of the disease or a better responsiveness to cancer immune therapy. Moreover, these signatures overlap with those observed during immune-mediated cancer rejection and, more broadly, immune-mediated tissue-specific destruction in other immune pathologies. Thus, a discussion concerning this cancer phenotype is warranted as it remains unknown why it occurs in immune competent hosts. It also remains uncertain whether a genetically determined response of the host to its own cancer, the genetic makeup of the neoplastic process or a combination of both drives the inflammatory process. Here we reflect on commonalities and discrepancies among studies and on the genetic or somatic conditions that may cause this schism in cancer behavior.

Indexed as

HumansImmunityNeoplasmsPrognosisTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID21875439
PMCPMC3175185
OpenAlexW2125810837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.