Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21874322›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2011

Statistical parametric maps of ¹⁸F-FDG PET and 3-D autoradiography in the rat brain: a cross-validation study.

Elena Prieto, María Collantes, Mercedes Delgado, Carlos Juri, Luis García-García, Francisco Molinet, María E Fernández-Valle, Miguel A Pozo, Belén Gago, Josep M Martí-Climent and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. GABAMolecular imaging and biology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elena PrietoNuclear Medicine Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Av. Pío XII 36, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
María Collantes
Mercedes Delgado
Carlos Juri
Luis García-García
Francisco Molinet
María E Fernández-Valle
Miguel A Pozo
Belén Gago
Josep M Martí-Climent
José A Obeso
Iván Peñuelas
Clinica Universidad de Navarra · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESBiomedical Research Networking Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough specific positron emission tomography (PET) scanners have been developed for small animals, spatial resolution remains one of the most critical technical limitations, particularly in the evaluation of the rodent brain. The purpose of the present study was to examine the reliability of voxel-based statistical analysis (Statistical Parametric Mapping, SPM) applied to (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET images of the rat brain, acquired on a small animal PET not specifically designed for rodents. The gold standard for the validation of the PET results was the autoradiography of the same animals acquired under the same physiological conditions, reconstructed as a 3-D volume and analysed using SPM.

methodsEleven rats were studied under two different conditions: conscious or under inhalatory anaesthesia during (18)F-FDG uptake. All animals were studied in vivo under both conditions in a dedicated small animal Philips MOSAIC PET scanner and magnetic resonance images were obtained for subsequent spatial processing. Then, rats were randomly assigned to a conscious or anaesthetized group for postmortem autoradiography, and slices from each animal were aligned and stacked to create a 3-D autoradiographic volume. Finally, differences in (18)F-FDG uptake between conscious and anaesthetized states were assessed from PET and autoradiography data by SPM analysis and results were compared.

resultsSPM results of PET and 3-D autoradiography are in good agreement and led to the detection of consistent cortical differences between the conscious and anaesthetized groups, particularly in the bilateral somatosensory cortices. However, SPM analysis of 3-D autoradiography also highlighted differences in the thalamus that were not detected with PET.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that any difference detected with SPM analysis of MOSAIC PET images of rat brain is detected also by the gold standard autoradiographic technique, confirming that this methodology provides reliable results, although partial volume effects might make it difficult to detect slight differences in small regions.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18AnimalsAutoradiographyBrainBrain MappingData Interpretation, StatisticalImaging, Three-DimensionalMalePositron-Emission TomographyRadiographyRadiopharmaceuticalsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyStatistics as TopicSubtraction TechniqueTissue DistributionFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID21874322
OpenAlexW1967847499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.