ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2012
Disease-free probability after the first primary ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a comparison between African-American and White-American women.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Variation in patterns of second primary malignancies across U.S. race and ethnicity groups: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) analysis.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2024Article
- Associations of race and ethnicity with risk of developing invasive breast cancer after lobular carcinoma in situ.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2019Article
- Race and risk of subsequent aggressive breast cancer following ductal carcinoma in situ.Cancer · 2019Article
- Breast Cancer Outcomes in a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Cohort of Insured Women.Ethnicity & disease · 2018Article
- Comparing treatment and outcomes of ductal carcinoma in situ among women in Missouri by race.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2016Article
- Racial and ethnic differences in risk of second primary cancers among breast cancer survivors.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2015Article
- Racial disparities in risk of second breast tumors after ductal carcinoma in situ.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2014Article
- Triple-negative breast cancer risk in women is defined by the defect of estrogen signaling: preventive and therapeutic implications.OncoTargets and therapy · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Compelling evidence about the differences in the biology and behavior of invasive breast cancer between African-American (AA) and White-American (WA) women motivate inquiry into comparing the clinicopathology of non-invasive breast cancer (ductal carcinoma in situ, DCIS). AA and WA women diagnosed with their first primary DCIS between 1990 and 1999 were identified from the institutional tumor registry. Data on method of presentation, treatment, and patient characteristics were retrieved from electronic medical records. Patients were followed up through the medical records until the diagnosis of a subsequent cancer or the last day of contact with the institution. A total of 100 (29.6%) AAs and 236 (70.4%) WAs with the mean age of 60 (SD ± 13) and 57 (SD ± 12), respectively, contributed to this study. DCIS was detected during routine screening mammography for 81% (n = 81) of AAs and 88.4% (n = 206) of WAs (P = 0.073). Differences in the distributions of grade, margin status, necrosis, or treatment modalities were not statistically significant between AAs and WAs. Analysis of competing risks Cox proportional hazard multivariate modeling yielded a significant 8-year cumulative risk of a second cancer for AAs but only in the ipsilateral breast (HR = 3.96, 95% CI 1.42-11.04, P = 0.01). Despite comparable clinical presentation and treatment, 8 years after the initial treatment, AAs experienced a higher risk of second breast cancer in ipsilateral but not in the contralateral breast. The observed excess risk of a second cancer in the ipsilateral breast may suggest of intrinsic differences in the biology of cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.