ArticleBMJ case reports2009
Not every cough in bronchiolitis season is bronchiolitis.
Article in BMJ case reports, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 2-month-old male infant presented to hospital for the third time in late autumn with a 4 week history of cough and respiratory distress. He had presented to hospital on two occasions during the previous two weeks, and had twice been discharged with a diagnosis of bronchiolitis, based on clinical findings and the season. That the nasopharyngeal aspirate (NPA) was negative for respiratory viruses did not alter the diagnosis as this was felt to be a common false negative finding. However his cough worsened and on his third presentation he had respiratory distress with bilateral crackles and wheeze. The C reactive protein was 121 mg/l but the NPA was again negative for viruses. He was investigated for atypical causes of lower respiratory tract infection and the NPA was positive for Chlamydia trachomatis by polymerase chain reaction. He was treated with a 5 day course of azithromycin and made a full recovery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.