Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21873922›Full record

Trial reportOptometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry2011

Treatment of accommodative dysfunction in children: results from a randomized clinical trial.

Mitchell Scheiman, Susan Cotter, Marjean Taylor Kulp, G Lynn Mitchell, Jeffrey Cooper, Michael Gallaway, Kristine B Hopkins, Mary Bartuccio, Ida Chung, Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial Study Group

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Effectiveness of vergence/accommodative therapy for accommodative dysfunction in children with convergence insufficiency.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2021
    Trial
  4. Binocular Vision Anomalies: An Update on Prevalence, Impact, Technological and Treatment Developments and Current Challenges.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Classification of accommodative insufficiency by monocular subjective push-up test is poorly predictive of monocular objective amplitudes in children and young adults.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Mitchell ScheimanPennsylvania College of Optometry at Salus University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19141, USA. mscheiman@salus.edu
Susan Cotter
Marjean Taylor Kulp
G Lynn Mitchell
Jeffrey Cooper
Michael Gallaway
Kristine B Hopkins
Mary Bartuccio
Ida Chung
Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial Study Group
Fundação Armando Alvares Penteado · BRSalus University · US

Funding

Convergence Insuffiency Treatment TrialU10EY014713 · NEI · SALUS UNIVERSITY · PI SCHEIMAN, MITCHELL M · 2004 to 2006
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS U10 EY014713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo report the effectiveness of various forms of vision therapy/orthoptics in improving accommodative amplitude and facility in children with symptomatic convergence insufficiency (CI) and co-existing accommodative dysfunction.

methodsIn a randomized clinical trial, 221 children aged 9 to 17 years with symptomatic CI were assigned to one of four treatments. Of the enrolled children, 164 (74%) had accommodative dysfunction; 63 (29%) had a decreased amplitude of accommodation with respect to age, 43 (19%) had decreased accommodative facility, and 58 (26%) had both. Analysis of variance models were used to compare mean accommodative amplitude and accommodative facility for each treatment group after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment.

resultsAfter 12 weeks of treatment, the increases in amplitude of accommodation [office-based vergence/accommodative therapy with home reinforcement group (OBVAT) 9.9 D, home-based computer vergence/accommodative therapy group (HBCVAT+) 6.7 D, and home-based pencil push-up therapy group (HBPP) 5.8 D] were significantly greater than in the office-based placebo therapy (OBPT) group (2.2 D) (p-values ≤0.010). Significant increases in accommodative facility were found in all groups (OBVAT: 9 cpm, HBCVAT+: 7 cpm, HBPP: 5 cpm, OBPT: 5.5 cpm); only the improvement in the OBVAT group was significantly greater than that found in the OBPT group (p = 0.016). One year after completion of therapy, reoccurrence of decreased accommodative amplitude was present in only 12.5% and accommodative facility in only 11%.

conclusionsVision therapy/orthoptics is effective in improving accommodative amplitude and accommodative facility in school-aged children with symptomatic CI and accommodative dysfunction.

Indexed as

Accommodation, OcularAdolescentChildConvergence, OcularFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleOcular Motility DisordersOrthopticsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVision, BinocularVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID21873922
PMCPMC3204163
OpenAlexW2126085984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.