Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21873653›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2011

Inhibition of lens photodamage by UV-absorbing contact lenses.

Usha P Andley, James P Malone, R Reid Townsend

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Protective effects of appropriate Zn(2+) levels against UVB radiation-induced damage in human lens epithelial cells in vitro.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2016
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Attenuation of human lens epithelial cell spreading, migration and contraction via downregulation of the PI3K/Akt pathway.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Usha P AndleyDepartments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. andley@vision.wustl.edu
James P Malone
R Reid Townsend

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (UL1)UL1RR024992 · NCRR · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2007 to 2011
$45.4M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER VISION RESEARCHP30EY002687 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Philip Andrew Ruzycki · 1985 to 2026
$18.4M
YOGA LIFESTYLE INTERVENTION REDUCES BLOOD PRESSURE IN HIV-INFECTED ADULTSP41RR000954 · NCRR · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GROSS, MICHAEL L · 1985 to 2011
$16.0M
Washington University Center for Translational NeuroscienceP30NS057105 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HOLTZMAN, DAVID M. · 2006 to 2011
$8.7M
ROLE OF OXYGEN IN OCULAR PATHOLOGYR01EY005681 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ANDLEY, USHA P · 1985 to 2018
$7.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR000954NCRR NIH HHS P41-RR00954NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024992NEI NIH HHS EY02687NEI NIH HHS P30 EY002687NEI NIH HHS R01 EY005681NEI NIH HHS R01EY05681NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS057105NINDS NIH HHS P30NS057105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine whether class 1 UV-blocking contact lenses protect against UVB radiation-induced damage in a human lens epithelial cell line (HLE B-3) and postmortem human lenses using a proteomics approach.

methodsHLE B-3 cells were exposed to 6.4 mW/cm(2) UVB radiation at 302 nm for 2 minutes (768 mJ/cm(2)) with or without covering by senofilcon A class 1 UV-blocking contact lenses or lotrafilcon A non-UV-blocking (lotrafilcon A has some UV-blocking ability, albeit minimal) contact lenses. Control cells were not exposed to UVB radiation. Four hours after treatment, cells were analyzed by two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis and tandem mass spectrometry, and changes in protein abundance were quantified. F-actin and microtubule cytoskeletons were examined by fluorescence staining. In addition, human donor lenses were exposed to UVB radiation at 302 nm for 4 minutes (1536 mJ/cm(2)). Cortical and epithelial cell proteins were scraped from lens surfaces and subjected to the same protein analyses.

resultsSenofilcon A lenses were beneficial for protecting HLE B-3 cells against UVB radiation-induced changes in caldesmon 1 isoform, lamin A/C transcript variant 1, DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide, β-actin, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PDH), annexin A2, triose phosphate isomerase, and ubiquitin B precursor. These contact lenses also prevented actin and microtubule cytoskeleton changes typically induced by UVB radiation. Conversely, non-UV-blocking contact lenses were not protective. UVB-irradiated human lenses showed marked reductions in αA-crystallin, αB-crystallin, aldehyde dehydrogenase 1, βS-crystallin, βB2-crystallin, and G3PDH, and UV-absorbing contact lenses significantly prevented these alterations.

conclusionsSenofilcon A class 1 UV-blocking contact lenses largely prevented UVB-induced changes in protein abundance in lens epithelial cells and in human lenses.

Indexed as

Contact LensesCataractCell Line, TransformedElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalEpithelial CellsEye ProteinsHumansLens, CrystallineMass SpectrometryMiddle AgedProteomicsRadiation InjuriesUltraviolet RaysEye Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21873653
PMCPMC3208141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.