Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21869866›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2011

Beyond microscopic reversibility: Are observable non-equilibrium processes precisely reversible?

Divesh Bhatt, Daniel M Zuckerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. ModBindProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. WEDAP: A Python Package for Streamlined Plotting of Molecular Simulation Data.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  5. Weighted ensemble: Recent mathematical developments.The Journal of chemical physics · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Divesh BhattDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh, 3501 Fifth Ave, Biomedical Sciences Tower 3, Pittsburgh, PA 15260.
Daniel M Zuckerman

Funding

Fast Computations for Structural Transitions in ProteinsR01GM070987 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ZUCKERMAN, DANIEL M · 2004 to 2008
$1.1M
Toward Practical, Rigorous Binding Affinity CalculationsR01GM076569 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ZUCKERMAN, DANIEL M · 2007 to 2011
$1.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070987NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076569
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the principle of microscopic reversibility has been studied for many decades, there remain ambiguities in its application to non-equilibrium processes of importance to chemistry, physics and biology. Examples include whether protein unfolding should follow the same pathways and in the same proportions as folding, and whether unbinding should likewise mirror binding. Using continuum-space calculations which extend previous kinetic analyses, we demonstrate formally that the precise symmetry of forward and reverse processes is expected only under certain special conditions. Approximate symmetry will be exhibited under a separate set of conditions. Exact, approximate, and broken symmetry scenarios are verified in several ways: using numerical calculations on toy and molecular systems; using exact calculations on kinetic models of induced fit in protein-ligand binding; and based on reported experimental results. The analysis highlights intrinsic challenges and ambiguities in the design and analysis of both experiments and simulations.

Identifiers

PMID21869866
PMCPMC3159166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.