Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21869692›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical psychopharmacology2011

Antagonist-elicited cannabis withdrawal in humans.

David A Gorelick, Robert S Goodwin, Eugene Schwilke, David M Schwope, William D Darwin, Deanna L Kelly, Robert P McMahon, Fang Liu, Catherine Ortemann-Renon, Denis Bonnet and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical psychopharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Barriers to the wider adoption of medicinalBritish journal of pain · 2020
    Article
  2. CannabinoidJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2020
    Review
  3. The cannabis withdrawal syndrome: current insights.Substance abuse and rehabilitation · 2017
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

David A GorelickIntramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
Robert S Goodwin
Eugene Schwilke
David M Schwope
William D Darwin
Deanna L Kelly
Robert P McMahon
Fang Liu
Catherine Ortemann-Renon
Denis Bonnet
Marilyn A Huestis
National Institute on Drug Abuse · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USSanofi (France) · FR

Funding

Assessment Of A Cannabinoid Antagonist In HumansZIADA000415 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI HUESTIS, MARILYN A · 2009 to 2013
$1.1M
ASSESSMENT OF A CANNABINOID ANTAGONIST IN HUMANSZ01DA000415 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI HUESTIS, MARILYN · 1998 to 2008
$1.1M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 DA000415Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DA000415PHS HHS HHSN271200599091CADB
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonists have potential therapeutic benefits, but antagonist-elicited cannabis withdrawal has not been reported in humans. Ten male daily cannabis smokers received 8 days of increasingly frequent 20-mg oral Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) dosages (40-120 mg/d) around-the-clock to standardize cannabis dependence while residing on a closed research unit. On the ninth day, double-blind placebo or 20- (suggested therapeutic dose) or 40-mg oral rimonabant, a CB1-cannabinoid receptor antagonist, was administered. Cannabis withdrawal signs and symptoms were assessed before and for 23.5 hours after rimonabant. Rimonabant, THC, and 11-hydroxy-THC plasma concentrations were quantified by mass spectrometry. The first 6 subjects received 20-mg rimonabant (1 placebo); the remaining 4 subjects received 40-mg rimonabant (1 placebo). Fourteen subjects enrolled; 10 completed before premature termination because of withdrawal of rimonabant from clinical development. Three of 5 subjects in the 20-mg group, 1 of 3 in the 40-mg group, and none of 2 in the placebo group met the prespecified withdrawal criterion of 150% increase or higher in at least 3 visual analog scales for cannabis withdrawal symptoms within 3 hours of rimonabant dosing. There were no significant associations between visual analog scale, heart rate, or blood pressure changes and peak rimonabant plasma concentration, area-under-the-rimonabant-concentration-by-time curve (0-8 hours), or peak rimonabant/THC or rimonabant/(THC + 11-hydroxy-THC) plasma concentration ratios. In summary, prespecified criteria for antagonist-elicited cannabis withdrawal were not observed at the 20- or 40-mg rimonabant doses. These data do not preclude antagonist-elicited withdrawal at higher rimonabant doses.

Indexed as

AdultArea Under CurveDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDronabinolHumansMaleMarijuana AbuseMass SpectrometryPiperidinesPyrazolesReceptor, Cannabinoid, CB1RimonabantSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeYoung Adult11-hydroxy-delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinolDronabinolPiperidinesPyrazolesReceptor, Cannabinoid, CB1Rimonabant

Identifiers

PMID21869692
PMCPMC3717344
OpenAlexW1987628391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.