Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21867430›Full record

ArticleRadiation research2011

Dietary selenium for the mitigation of radiation injury: effects of selenium dose escalation and timing of supplementation.

Fritz Sieber, Sarah A Muir, Eric P Cohen, Brian L Fish, Marylou Mäder, Ashley M Schock, Bryan J Althouse, John E Moulder

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Radiomitigators: Breakthroughs in Post-Radiation Recovery.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Radioprotective Effects of Zinc and Selenium on Mice Spermatogenesis.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fritz SieberDepartment of Pediatrics and Children's Research Institute, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, USA. fsieber@mcw.edu
Sarah A Muir
Eric P Cohen
Brian L Fish
Marylou Mäder
Ashley M Schock
Bryan J Althouse
John E Moulder
Children's Hospital of Wisconsin · USMilwaukee VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Training and educationU19AI067734 · NIAID · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI OTTERSON, MARY F. · 2005 to 2009
$18.2M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI067734NIAID NIH HHS U19-AI067734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We recently reported that daily dietary supplementation with 100 µg selenium (a dose exceeding a rat's nutritional requirement by about 33-fold) initiated immediately after total-body irradiation (TBI) and maintained for 21 weeks mitigates radiation nephropathy in a rat model as indicated by blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels and histopathological criteria (Radiat Res. 2009; 17:368-73). In this follow-up study, we explored the risks and benefits of delaying the onset of supplementation, shortening periods of supplementation, and escalating selenium supplementation beyond 100 µg/day. Supplementation with 200 µg selenium/day (as selenite or seleno-l-methionine) substantially improved the mitigation of radiation nephropathy by lowering BUN levels at 4 months after TBI from 115 to as low as 34 mg/dl and by proportionally lowering the incidence of histopathological abnormalities. Shortening the period of supplementation to 3 or 2 months did not compromise efficacy. Delaying the onset of supplementation for 1 week reduced but did not abrogate the mitigation of radiation nephropathy. Supplementation with 300 µg/day mitigated radiation nephropathy less effectively than 200 µg and was poorly tolerated. Rats that had been given 10 Gy of TBI were less tolerant of high-dose selenium than nonirradiated rats. This reduced tolerance of high-dose selenium would need to be taken into consideration when selenium is used for the mitigation of radiation injury in victims of nuclear accidents or acts of radiological terrorism. The high dose requirements, the pronounced threshold effect, and the superior performance of selenite suggest that the mitigation of radiation nephropathy involves mechanisms that go beyond the induction of selenoproteins.

Indexed as

DietAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleHumansRadiation InjuriesRatsSeleniumSelenium

Identifiers

PMID21867430
PMCPMC3237945
OpenAlexW2164142620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.