Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21867420›Full record

ArticleVector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.)2011

Agents of human anaplasmosis and Lyme disease at Camp Ripley, Minnesota.

Russell C Johnson, Carrie Kodner, Janet Jarnefeld, Deborah K Eck, Yaning Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Regional and Local Temporal Trends ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Russell C JohnsonUniversity of Minnesota, Department of Microbiology, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. johns014@umn.edu
Carrie Kodner
Janet Jarnefeld
Deborah K Eck
Yaning Xu
University of Minnesota System · USConsolidated Mosquito Abatement District · US

Funding

LYME DISEASE: STUDY OF THE ETIOLOGICAL AGENTR01AR034744 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI JOHNSON, RUSSELL C · 1986 to 1999
–
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR 34744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transmission dynamics of Anaplasma phagocytophilum (Ap) and Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb) among Ixodes scapularis (Is) and mammalian hosts was investigated at Camp Ripley, an area representative of central Minnesota. Prevalence of white-footed mouse infection with Ap and Bb were 20% and 42%, respectively, with a coinfection level of 14%. Peak levels of infection with both agents occurred in May. The average levels of seropositivity to Ap and Bb were 29.3% and 48%, respectively. Of the mice infected with Ap, 47.5% were able to eliminate the pathogen as compared with 19.4% of mice infected with Bb. Ap was detected in 88.4% of 43 eastern chipmunks examined and isolated from 44.7% of the animals. Bb was present in 72.7% of 11 chipmunks examined, and 100% of the animals were also infected with Ap. The seasonality of tick activity differs from that reported for the New York area. Is infestation of mice began in May with peak nymphal infestation also occurring in May (7.4 per infested mouse) and overlapping with peak larval infestation in June (77.1 per infested mouse). Infestation ranged from 100% in May to 34.5% in October. Is comprised 98.4% of the ticks infesting the mice. The temporal pattern of the developmental stages of Is infesting chipmunks was the same as for mice, except that the tick burdens were greater. The nymphal stage peaked in May (81.3 per animal), and the larval stage peaked in June (164.7 per animal). Infestation was 100% in May-August, and >99% of the ticks were Is. Antibodies to Ap were present in >80% of the white-tailed deer examined, but they were infected with the Ap-1 variant rather than the Ap strain infecting mice and humans. Antibodies to Bb were detected in >80% of the deer, but Bb DNA was only detected in 1.5% of blood specimens.

Indexed as

Anaplasma phagocytophilumAnaplasmosisAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialArachnid VectorsBorrelia burgdorferiDeerEhrlichiosisHumansIxodesLyme DiseaseMinnesotaPeromyscusPolymerase Chain ReactionSciuridaeAntibodies, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID21867420
PMCPMC3231789
OpenAlexW1992077708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.