Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21866153›Full record

ArticleNature2011

Germ-layer and lineage-restricted stem/progenitors regenerate the mouse digit tip.

Yuval Rinkevich, Paul Lindau, Hiroo Ueno, Michael T Longaker, Irving L Weissman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 225 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
225citing papers in PubMed
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

225 citing papers in PubMed, 385 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A Single Cell Atlas of the Newt Iris During Lens Regeneration.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Advances in CRISPR-Cas9 in lineage tracing of model animals.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Specific cell states underlie complex tissue regeneration in spiny mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Modulating DNA Polα Enhances Cell Reprogramming Across Species.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  19. Hallmarks of regeneration.Cell stem cell · 2024
    Review
  20. Review

165 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuval RinkevichStanford Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5323, USA. ryuval@stanford.edu
Paul Lindau
Hiroo Ueno
Michael T Longaker
Irving L Weissman
Stanford University · US

Funding

Interrogation of individual cells to identify progenitors and their nichesU01HL099999 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WEISSMAN, IRVING L. · 2009 to 2015
$7.8M
Interrogation of individual cells to identify progenitor cells and their nichesU01HL099995 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KRASNOW, MARK A · 2009 to 2015
$7.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL099995NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL099999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The regrowth of amputated limbs and the distal tips of digits represent models of tissue regeneration in amphibians, fish and mice. For decades it had been assumed that limb regeneration derived from the blastema, an undifferentiated pluripotent cell population thought to be derived from mature cells via dedifferentiation. Here we show that a wide range of tissue stem/progenitor cells contribute towards the restoration of the mouse distal digit. Genetic fate mapping and clonal analysis of individual cells revealed that these stem cells are lineage restricted, mimicking digit growth during development. Transplantation of cyan-fluorescent-protein-expressing haematopoietic stem cells, and parabiosis between genetically marked mice, confirmed that the stem/progenitor cells are tissue resident, including the cells involved in angiogenesis. These results, combined with those from appendage regeneration in other vertebrate subphyla, collectively demonstrate that tissue stem cells rather than pluripotent blastema cells are an evolutionarily conserved cellular mode for limb regeneration after amputation.

Indexed as

Cell LineageAnimalsBone and BonesClone CellsEctodermEndotheliumExtremitiesFemaleGerm LayersHematopoietic Stem CellsMaleMesodermMiceOrgan SpecificityRegenerationStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID21866153
PMCPMC3812235
OpenAlexW2070255306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.