Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21865578›Full record

ReviewNeurology2011

Early stroke risk and ABCD2 score performance in tissue- vs time-defined TIA: a multicenter study.

M F Giles, G W Albers, P Amarenco, E M Arsava, A W Asimos, H Ay, D Calvet, S B Coutts, B L Cucchiara, A M Demchuk and 12 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Synthetic role of miR-200b-3p, ABCDBrain and behavior · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Tissue-Based Stroke Definition Impacts Stroke Incidence but not Ethnic Differences.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

M F GilesStroke Prevention Research Unit, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Department of Clinical Neurology, Level 6, West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK. matthew.giles@clneuro.ox.ac.uk
G W Albers
P Amarenco
E M Arsava
A W Asimos
H Ay
D Calvet
S B Coutts
B L Cucchiara
A M Demchuk
S C Johnston
P J Kelly
A S Kim
J Labreuche
P C Lavallee
J-L Mas
A Merwick
J M Olivot
F Purroy
W D Rosamond
R Sciolla
P M Rothwell

Funding

Heart-Brain Interactions In Human Acute Ischemic StrokeR01NS059710 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI AY, HAKAN · 2009 to 2013
$1.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS059710
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesStroke risk immediately after TIA defined by time-based criteria is high, and prognostic scores (ABCD2 and ABCD3-I) have been developed to assist management. The American Stroke Association has proposed changing the criteria for the distinction between TIA and stroke from time-based to tissue-based. Research using these definitions is lacking. In a multicenter observational cohort study, we have investigated prognosis and performance of the ABCD2 score in TIA, subcategorized as tissue-positive or tissue-negative on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) or CT imaging according to the newly proposed criteria.

methodsTwelve centers provided data on ABCD2 scores, DWI or CT brain imaging, and follow-up in cohorts of patients with TIA diagnosed by time-based criteria. Stroke rates at 7 and 90 days were studied in relation to tissue-positive or tissue-negative subcategorization, according to the presence or absence of brain infarction. The predictive power of the ABCD2 score was determined using area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) analyses.

resultsA total of 4,574 patients were included. Among DWI patients (n = 3,206), recurrent stroke rates at 7 days were 7.1%(95% confidence interval 5.5-9.1) after tissue-positive and 0.4% (0.2-0.7) after tissue-negative events (p diff < 0.0001). Corresponding rates in CT-imaged patients were 12.8% (9.3-17.4) and 3.0% (2.0-4.2), respectively (p diff < 0.0001). The ABCD2 score had predictive value in tissue-positive and tissue-negative events (AUC = 0.68 [95% confidence interval 0.63-0.73] and 0.73 [0.67-0.80], respectively; p sig < 0.0001 for both results, p diff = 0.17). Tissue-positive events with low ABCD2 scores and tissue-negative events with high ABCD2 scores had similar stroke risks, especially after a 90-day follow-up.

conclusionsOur findings support the concept of a tissue-based definition of TIA and stroke, at least on prognostic grounds.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexArea Under CurveCohort StudiesDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansInternational CooperationIschemic Attack, TransientMalePredictive Value of TestsRisk FactorsStatistics, NonparametricStrokeTime FactorsTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID21865578
PMCPMC3179650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.